Theoretical framework. The framework of Kohlberg's theory consists of six stages arranged sequentially in successive tiers of complexity. He organized his six stages into three general levels of moral development.
What are the six stages of moral development?
Like Piaget, subjects were unlikely to regress in their moral development, but instead, moved forward through the stages: pre-conventional, conventional, and finally post-conventional . Each stage offers a new perspective, but not everyone functions at the highest level all the time.
What are the 3 levels of moral development?
Kohlberg identified three distinct levels of moral reasoning: preconventional, conventional, and postconventional . Each level has two sub-stages.
How many stages of moral development are there in each level?
Kohlberg's theory proposes that there are three levels of moral development, with each level split into two stages . Kohlberg suggested that people move through these stages in a fixed order, and that moral understanding is linked to cognitive development.
What is the sequence of stages of moral development as identified by Lawrence Kohlberg?
What is the sequence of stages of moral development as identified by Lawrence Kohlberg? preconventional, conventional, postconventional .
What is an example of moral development?
For example, young children will say that when trying to reach a forbidden cookie jar , breaking 10 cups is worse than breaking one. They also recognize the sanctity of rules. ... He also believed that children developed moral reasoning quickly and at an early age.
What is the Postconventional stage?
At the postconventional level, the individual moves beyond the perspective of his or her own society . Morality is defined in terms of abstract principles and values that apply to all situations and societies. The individual attempts to take the perspective of all individuals.
What is the ideal stage of moral development?
According to Kohlberg, an individual progresses from the capacity for pre-conventional morality (before age 9) to the capacity for conventional morality ( early adolescence ), and toward attaining post-conventional morality (once Piaget's idea of formal operational thought is attained), which only a few fully achieve.
Does everyone achieve the last stage of moral development?
People at this stage develop their own set of moral guidelines that may or not fit into the law. ... According to Kohlberg, most people will reach the highest stage of moral development .
How do you promote moral development?
- Offering a warm, nurturing, empathetic relationship between parent and child. ...
- Consistently behaving in a moral manner. ...
- Teaching respect through your parenting style.
What is Preconventional morality?
In human behaviour: A moral sense
What is Piaget's theory of moral development?
Moral development refers to the process through which children develop the standards of right and wrong within their society, based on social and cultural norms, and laws. ... Piaget conceptualizes moral development as a constructivist process , whereby the interplay of action and thought builds moral concepts.
What is cognitive moral development?
Cognitive moral development, often referred to as moral reasoning, stems from the field of cognitive developmental
What are the factors that affect moral development?
Moral development is strongly influenced by interpersonal factors, such as family, peers, and culture . Intrapersonal factors also impact moral development, such as cognitive changes, emotions, and even neurodevelopment.
What is the importance of moral development?
Moral development is an important part of the socialization process . The term refers to the way people learn what society considered to be “good” and “bad,” which is important for a smoothly functioning society.
What is Piaget's first stage of moral development?
After the age of two, up to the age of seven, children are in the first stage of Piaget's moral development, where they are very rigid in their beliefs of moral concepts. Piaget termed this first stage the “ Morality of Constraint” .
