Lower Court Ruling: The juvenile court judge committed Gault to juvenile detention until he attained the age of 21 . At that time, no appeal was permitted in juvenile cases by Arizona law; therefore, a habeas petition was filed in the Supreme Court of Arizona and referred to the Superior Court for a hearing.
What happened in the In re Gault case?
Lower Court Ruling: The juvenile court judge committed Gault to juvenile detention until he attained the age of 21 . At that time, no appeal was permitted in juvenile cases by Arizona law; therefore, a habeas petition was filed in the Supreme Court of Arizona and referred to the Superior Court for a hearing.
What is the significance of the Kent case?
Kent v. United States is a landmark decision that established a bar of due process for youth waived to the adult system . Since the decision, legislatures across the country have passed laws protecting the rights of youth who become involved with the justice system, but there is still a lot of work to do.
What happened in the Kent v United States case?
In Kent v. United States, in 1966, the U.S. Supreme Court noted that the “objectives” of the juvenile courts are “to provide measures of guidance and rehabilitation for the child and protection for society , not to fix criminal responsibility, guilt and punishment.
What was the significance of the In re Gault case?
It was the first time that the Supreme Court held that children facing delinquency prosecution have many of the same legal rights as adults in criminal court , including the right to an attorney, the right to remain silent, the right to notice of the charges, and the right to a full hearing on the merits of the case.
What did the court rule in the 1970 case of In re Winship quizlet?
In the case of In re Winship, Winship was sentenced to 18 months in a training school for stealing money from a women's purse . ... This case established ground rules for determining whether a juvenile has knowingly and voluntarily waived his rights.
What happened to Morris Kent?
What happened to Morris Kent? He was 21 at the time of the Supreme Court's decision (and outside of the juvenile court's jurisdiction), so his case was remanded to the district court for a de novo waiver hearing. ... The appellate court vacated his criminal convictions. Morris Kent was eventually released from St.
Who won the case of Kent v United States?
In a 5-4 decision, Justice Abe Fortas wrote for the majority. The Supreme Court determined there was not a sufficient investigation prior to the juvenile court waiver of jurisdiction. Kent did not receive a hearing, access to counsel, or access to his record prior to the waiver.
What did the court rule in the 1970 case of In re Winship?
In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358 (1970), was a United States Supreme Court decision that held that “ the Due Process clause protects the accused against conviction except upon proof beyond a reasonable doubt of every fact necessary to constitute the crime charged .” It established this burden in all cases in all states ( ...
What crimes did Morris Kent commit?
* At the age of sixteen the appellant, Morris Kent, was accused of committing several robberies and rapes . He was waived by the juvenile court and indicted on three counts of housebreaking, three counts of robbery, and two counts of rape.
What rights did re Gault violate?
In an 8–1 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Gault's commitment to the State Industrial School was a violation of the Sixth Amendment since he had been denied the right to an attorney, had not been formally notified of the charges against him, had not been informed of his right against self-incrimination, and ...
What was the result of the Gault decision quizlet?
The Supreme Court determined Gault was denied due process and overturned his sentence for allegedly making an obscene phone call .
What major legal rights were provided juveniles as the result of In re Gault and why is it considered such a landmark case?
Gault Case Changed Juvenile Law : NPR. Gault Case Changed Juvenile Law In 1967 a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision gave juveniles accused of crimes the same due process rights as adults . The case involved Jerry Gault, who at 14 was given a seven-year sentence for a prank phone call.
What did the Supreme Court conclude in the case In re Gault quizlet?
The Court ruled in 1975 that students who face temporary suspension from school have liberty interests that require due process protection. The U.S. Supreme Court in the In re Gault case stated that a juvenile is entitled to an attorney, and it the child could not afford one, one would be appointed .
What was Joseph McKeiver charged with?
Joseph McKeiver, then age 16, in May 1968 was charged with robbery, larceny, and receiving stolen goods (felonies under Pennsylvania law, Pa. Stat. Ann., Tit. 18, §§ 4704, 4807, and 4817 (1963)) as acts of juvenile delinquency.
Which is true of an adjudicatory hearing?
Unlike most criminal trials, adjudicatory hearings are typically held only in front of the judge, not a judge and jury. During the hearing, the prosecutor must present evidence to show the juvenile committed the offense .
