Blowing the whistle is prima facie justified on the balance of reasons when the expected risk the whistleblower estimates about the potential harm she may suffer from disclosing the information is higher than the estimated probability of the expected advantage she may enjoy from the disclosure.
When whistle-blowing is morally justified?
Briefly, (1) the firm’s actions will do serious and considerable harm to others; (2) the whistle-blowing act is justifiable once the employee reports it to her immediate supervisor and makes her moral concerns known; (3) absent any action by the supervisor, the employee should take the matter all the way up to the ...
Is whistleblowing a human right?
The Equality and Human Rights Commission is a prescribed body for whistleblowing about breaches of equality or human rights law . ... Remember that you will only be protected by whistleblowing law if the wrongdoing you report is in the public interest.
Is it worth being a whistleblower?
Whistleblowing can be a rewarding , fulfilling process
Financial rewards may be available to compensate whistleblowers for their efforts and injustices. And even when whistleblower cases do not result in a financial reward, they often bring about improvements and important changes in the offending company’s behavior.
Under what circumstances whistleblowing is justified?
In this article we argue that whistleblowing is justified when disclosures are made with the proper intent and fulfill specific communicative constraints in addressing issues of public interest . Three communicative constraints of informativeness, truthfulness and evidence are discussed in this regard.
What are the six conditions for justified whistleblowing?
Briefly, (1) the firm’s actions will do serious and considerable harm to others; (2) the whistleblowing act is justifiable once the employee reports it to her immediate supervisor and makes her moral concerns known; (3) absent any action by the supervisor, the employee should take the matter all the way up to the board ...
What are the two types of whistleblowing?
There are two types of whistleblowing. The first is internal whistleblowing . This means that the whistleblower reports misconduct to another person within the organization. The second type is external whistleblowing.
What is an example of whistleblowing?
Whistleblower Examples Include Employees Who Report Corruption, Discrimination, Harassment, and Fraud . Examples of whistleblower cases cover considerable territory, from accounting irregularities and government fraud to racial discrimination and sexual harassment.
What are the advantages of whistleblowing?
- Provides confidentiality. Whistleblowing support provides a confidential service that allows employees to draw attention to any issues that they feel are inappropriate for the workplace. ...
- Everyone can access support. ...
- Useful reports of misconduct. ...
- Expectations of the service.
What would Kant say about whistleblowing?
Analysis Based on Kantian Ethics
According to Kant to act from a good will is to act from a duty. ... If whistleblowing were a universal principle, all would benefit from the transparency and investor confidence would be maximized; therefore, according to Kant, the act of whistleblowing is morally permissible .
What is Whistleblowing procedure?
In this policy ‘Whistleblowing’ means the reporting by employees of suspected misconduct, illegal acts or failure to act within the Council . The aim of this Policy is to encourage employees and others who have serious concerns about any aspect of the Council’s work to come forward and voice those concerns.
Is Whistleblowing good or bad?
03/24/2015. The ethics of whistleblowing is a tricky matter. Whistle-blowing brings two moral values, fairness and loyalty, into conflict. ... Responsible people blow the whistle when they believe more harm than good will occur if the whistle-blower stays silent .
Is Whistleblowing anonymous?
Yes, a whistleblower can remain anonymous . ... Whistleblowing is where workers report misconduct within an organisation which they believe has the potential to endanger the public. This may be criminal activities, environmental damage or health and safety threats, for instance.
What are the disadvantages of whistleblowing?
- Drawback #1: You’ll be labeled. ...
- Reward #1: You can sleep at night. ...
- Drawback #2: You may face retaliation. ...
- Reward #2: You’ll empower other honest people. ...
- Drawback #3: Your finances (and maybe your sanity) will come under fire. ...
- Reward #3: The law should make you whole — and you might get a financial windfall.
Why are whistleblowers bad?
Often, the reason why whistleblowers suffer a bad reputation is that they are the key reason for uncovering significant fraud and seeing that those who are guilty are held accountable for their actions.
What are the cons of whistleblowing?
The Cons of Whistleblowing
It is the case that an employee who brings a whistleblowing claim or otherwise provides information to the government can face retaliation from an employer and may have difficulty in getting hired in related fields going forward .
