The difficulty in understanding, reviewing and writing of literature mainly emanates from failure right from the inception to clearly identify what precisely the reviewer wants and how to go about looking for it in a systematic and comprehensive manner .
What are the weaknesses of the literature review?
These reviews often fail to provide details of the overall research strategy, the selection and exclusion of articles, the limitations of the search method, and the quality of the search process , and they often lack details on how the analysis was conducted.
Why is literature review difficult?
Writing a literature review can be challenging because: you need to coordinate many sources and ideas into a logical argument . you may be dealing with language and ideas you haven’t fully mastered yet. there are no fixed rules for what to include or how to organise your writing.
What is the most difficult part in doing literature review?
“Introduction” is the hardest part. You must write from the inside to outside.
What are the strengths of a literature review?
A literature review should: 1. Increase one’s overall knowledge about a certain topic 2. Improve one’s information seeking skills (scanning literature effectively and efficiently and identifying a set of useful books, articles, and other literature) 3.
What are the top 3 common errors made when finding a literature review?
These common literature review errors are broken down into three general categories: Writing & Stylistic Issues . Issues with Literature Review Structure & Elements . Credibility/Validity Issues .
What is a good weakness?
- Creativity (many jobs don’t require creativity)
- Delegating tasks (if you’re not in a management role, you won’t need to delegate)
- Humor (it’s fine if you’re not funny)
- Spontaneity (you work better when prepared)
- Organization.
What are the pros and cons of a literature review?
| Pros of systematic literature reviews Cons of systematic literature reviews | Bias is reduced by the use of a systematic method for selecting studies for the review. Often more time-consuming than other types of review. |
|---|
Are literature reviews reliable?
Systematic reviews will always be the gold standard for reliable synthesis of evidence . However, traditional literature reviews remain popular and will continue to be valuable where systematic reviews are not feasible.
What is the most difficult thing to do when writing a review of literature Why?
A long listicle of your reading is problematic because lacks the kind of meta-commentary that is needed to guide the reader through your interpretation of the field, and the texts most relevant to your research. You have to know how to write without laundry-listing. Knowledge about the process of writing.
How hard is a literature review?
The entire dissertation is a test of your fortitude, but the lit review is particularly difficult for many students . ... As much as the literature review can begin to feel like the bane of your existence, at the end of the day, you need to look at it for what it really is – a glorified research paper.
Is it difficult to write a literature review?
After you’ve selected a topic, one of the first major tasks is writing the literature review — the section some experts say is the most difficult and time-consuming . ... That means critically evaluating the literature and looking for holes, unanswered questions and methodological weaknesses.
What are the essential components of a quality literature review?
Just like most academic papers, literature reviews also must contain at least three basic elements: an introduction or background information section ; the body of the review containing the discussion of sources; and, finally, a conclusion and/or recommendations section to end the paper.
What is the purpose of literature review?
A literature review establishes familiarity with and understanding of current research in a particular field before carrying out a new investigation. Conducting a literature review should enable you to find out what research has already been done and identify what is unknown within your topic.
What are the strengths of a systematic review?
Again, the potential strength of a systematic review lies in the transparency of each phase of the synthesis process , allowing the reader to focus on the merits of each decision made in compiling the information, rather than a simple contrast of one study to another as sometimes occurs in other types of reviews.
What should you avoid in writing a good literature review?
- Too descriptive. A literature review must go beyond a mere summary of what was reported by other researchers. ...
- Lack of quality sources. ...
- A by-article structure. ...
- No link to research question. ...
- Un-grounded statements. ...
- 15 Writers.
