On January 21, 2010, the Supreme Court issued a ruling in Citizens United v. ... The Court upheld the reporting and disclaimer requirements for independent expenditures and electioneering communications. The Court's ruling did not affect the ban on corporate contributions.
What was the outcome of Citizens United v FEC 2010 quizlet?
The Court ruled, 5-4, that the First Amendment prohibits limits on corporate funding of independent broadcasts in candidate elections . The justices said that the government's rationale for the limits on corporate spending—to prevent corruption—was not persuasive enough to restrict political speech.
What is the significance of the 2010 Supreme Court decision Citizens United v Federal Election Commission quizlet?
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), is a US constitutional law case, in which the United States Supreme Court held that the First Amendment prohibits the government from restricting political independent expenditures by corporations, associations, or labor unions .
What is the FEC and what does it do?
The Federal Election Commission enforces federal campaign finance laws, including monitoring donation prohibitions, and limits and oversees public funding for presidential campaigns.
What does citizens united stand for?
Citizens United's stated mission is to restore the United States government to “citizens' control, through a combination of education, advocacy, and grass-roots organization” seeking to “reassert the traditional American values of limited government, freedom of enterprise, strong families, and national sovereignty and ...
What did the Supreme Court decide in the case of mccutcheon V FEC quizlet?
The district court held that the aggregate limit served government interests by preventing corruption or the appearance of corruption and was set at a reasonable limit. You just studied 10 terms!
What was the decision in Baker v Carr quizlet?
Terms in this set (2)
Decision: The Warren Court reached a 6-2 verdict in favor of Baker . A lack of political question, previous court intervention in apportionment affairs and equal protection under the 14th amendment gave the court enough reason to rule on legislative apportionment.
What is the significance of Bush v Gore quizlet?
In Bush v. Gore (2000), a divided Supreme Court ruled that the state of Florida's court-ordered manual recount of vote ballots in the 2000 presidential election was unconstitutional . The case proved to be the climax of the contentious presidential race between Vice President Al Gore and Texas Governor George W. Bush.
What was the main idea of the ruling Buckley v Valeo quizlet?
Terms in this set (13) A 1976 case in which the Supreme Court struck down the portion of the Federal Election Campaign Act that set limits on the amount of money individuals could contribute to their own campaigns . The opinion of the majority was that setting such limits was a violation of free speech.
What is Citizens United v FEC quizlet?
Citizens United v. FEC was a Supreme Court case surrounding campaign finance and corporate involvement in politics . The Federal Election Commission was created in 1971 and greatly regulated the amount of campaign finance political candidates were able to receive.
What power does the FEC have?
The Federal Election Commission (FEC) is the independent regulatory agency charged with administering and enforcing the federal campaign finance law. The FEC has jurisdiction over the financing of campaigns for the U.S. House, Senate, Presidency and the Vice Presidency.
What did Citizens United vs FEC do?
Summary. On January 21, 2010, the Supreme Court issued a ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission overruling an earlier decision, Austin v. ... Federal Election Commission that held that corporations could be banned from making electioneering communications.
What does FEC stand for?
Regardless of their backgrounds or incomes, all must appear on each state's separate ballot and all must abide by rules enforced by the Federal Election Commission (FEC).
Did Citizens United created Super PACs?
Super PACs were made possible by two judicial decisions in 2010: the aforementioned Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission and, two months later, Speechnow.org v. FEC.
What is dark money in politics?
In the politics of the United States, dark money refers to political spending by nonprofit organizations—for example, 501(c)(4) (social welfare) 501(c)(5) (unions) and 501(c)(6) (trade association) groups—that are not required to disclose their donors.
Can corporations donate to PACs?
Corporations may make donations to Political Action Committees (PACs); PACs generally have strict limits on their ability to advocate on behalf of specific parties or candidates, or even to coordinate their activities with political campaigns. PACs are subject to disclosure requirements at the federal and state levels.
