What Is The Alternative To Meritocracy?

by | Last updated on January 24, 2024

, , , ,

5y. The opposite of meritocracy is kakistocracy , or the rule of the worst.

What is another word for meritocracy?

excellence value legality impartiality lawfulness equitableness beneficence obligingness kindheartedness mercy

What is the opposite of meritocracy?

5y. The opposite of meritocracy is kakistocracy , or the rule of the worst.

Is Harvard a meritocracy?

To Sandel, Harvard represents meritocracy run amok , epitomized by its less than five percent admissions rate.

What is an example of meritocracy?

Meritocracy is the idea that people get ahead based on their own accomplishments rather than, for example, on their parents’ social class . ... Do we live in a meritocracy? Well, maybe the best we can hope for is to live in an imperfect meritocracy.

Is capitalism a meritocracy?

It has been argued that meritocracy under capitalism will always remain a myth because, as Michael Kinsley states, “Inequalities of income, wealth, status are inevitable, and in a capitalist system even necessary.” Even though many economists admit that too much disparity between the rich and the poor can destabilize ...

Is a meritocracy good?

In addition to being false, a growing body of research in psychology and neuroscience suggests that believing in meritocracy makes people more selfish, less self-critical and even more prone to acting in discriminatory ways. Meritocracy is not only wrong; it’s bad .

What is a true meritocracy?

Meritocracy (merit, from Latin mereō, and -cracy, from Ancient Greek κράτος kratos ‘strength, power’) is a political system in which economic goods and/or political power are vested in individual people on the basis of talent, effort, and achievement, rather than wealth or social class.

What does meritocratic mean?

: a system, organization, or society in which people are chosen and moved into positions of success , power, and influence on the basis of their demonstrated abilities and merit (see merit entry 1 sense 1b) Only the elite, in that new meritocracy, would enjoy the opportunity for self-fulfillment ...—

What is the full meaning of mediocrity?

: the quality of something that is not very good : the quality or state of being mediocre. : a person who does not have the special ability to do something well.

Why do Bowles and Gintis argue that meritocracy is a myth?

Marxist sociologists Bowles and Gintis argue that capitalist societies are not meritocratic . Against Functionalists, they argue that it is not the amount of ability and effort an individual puts into their education that determines how well they do, but rather their class background.

What is meritocracy in sociology?

Meritocracy is a social system in which advancement in society is based on an . individual’s capabilities and merits rather than on the basis of family, wealth, or social.

What is the myth of meritocracy quizlet?

What is the main argument for the myth of meritocracy? That everyone doesn’t have an equal oppurtunity to achieve and rewarded on their ability and effort . What is the main factor whether someone can achieve according to Bowles and Gintis? You just studied 3 terms!

What are the disadvantages of meritocracy?

  • Merit, in most cases, is determined by education and can prove to be unaffordable in some countries.
  • Difficulties in acquiring higher education turns meritocracy into elitism.
  • Obstacles in pursuit of higher education for lower and middle class creates lack of opportunity.

Who believes in meritocracy sociology?

Functionalists Davis and Moore state that we live in a meritocratic society as the education system acts as a mechanism to ensure individuals do the right jobs (see role allocation). Therefore, individuals that work hard will be rewarded in society, whilst those who do not will not be rewarded.

What is a meritocracy in education?

We Can’t Debate ‘Meritocracy’ When Our Education System Stifles So Much Merit. ... For decades, meritocracy— rewarding individuals on the basis of intellectual ability —has been widely accepted as the ideal, and social inequities have been seen as breakdowns in its functioning.

Amira Khan
Author
Amira Khan
Amira Khan is a philosopher and scholar of religion with a Ph.D. in philosophy and theology. Amira's expertise includes the history of philosophy and religion, ethics, and the philosophy of science. She is passionate about helping readers navigate complex philosophical and religious concepts in a clear and accessible way.