What Is The Difference In Saying That Something Is Pious Because The Gods Love It And Saying That The Gods Love Something Because It Is Pious?

by | Last updated on January 24, 2024

, , , ,

The difference in saying that something is pious because the gods love it and saying that the gods love something because it is pious is that the first asserts that whatever the gods love is pious (i.e., that piety has no intrinsic quality). Under this definition, if the gods love suicide bombers, this would be pious.

What is the difference in saying that something is pious because the gods love it and saying that the gods love some thing because it is pious?

The difference in saying that something is pious because the gods love it and saying that the gods love something because it is pious is that the first asserts that whatever the gods love is pious (i.e., that piety has no intrinsic quality). Under this definition, if the gods love suicide bombers, this would be pious.

Are the acts pious because God loves them or does God love them because they are pious?

The explanation runs in a circle—it commits the fallacy of Begging the Question. Euthyphro effectively claims that acts are pious because the gods love them but that the gods love them because they are pious—which amounts to saying that acts are pious because they are pious, and that is no explanation at all.

Why does Socrates believe it is wrong to say that what makes something pious is the fact that the gods love it?

Socrates forces Euthyphro make a definition ‘piety’. Then, Euthyphro, quite carelessly, says ‘Something loved by all gods is pious. Socrates defends his statement: Because we agree that the pious is being loved for this reason, that it is pious, but it is not pious because it is being loved.

What is euthyphro’s second answer to the question what is piety and how does Socrates respond to that answer?

Socrates says that he is not looking for examples of piety, but rather for a definition of it. 5. Euthyphro’s second answer to Socrates’s basic question is: “what is dear to the gods is pious, what is not is impious. ” What are two reasons why this answer is not satisfactory?

What all the gods love is pious and what they all hate is impious?

Euthyphro 9e-11b. “the pious is what all the gods love, and the opposite, what all the gods hate, is the impious.” ... In other words, that which is pious is the same as that which is loved by all of the gods, according to Euthyphro.

Does God love pious?

answer: To be pious is to be loved by all the gods . Plato’s Argument against Euthyphro’s answer: ... But something that is pious isn’t so because it is loved by the gods; rather, it is loved by the gods because it is pious. Being loved by the gods causes god-belovedness, but being loved by the gods does not cause piety.

What is dear to the gods is pious?

2nd Definition: Piety is what is loved by the gods (“dear to the gods” in some translations); impiety is what is hated by the gods. ... On this definition, these things will be both pious and impious, which makes no sense. 3rd Definition: Piety is what is loved by all the gods. Impiety is what all the gods hate.

Can we be ethical without being religious?

Morality does not rely on religion ” “A man’s ethical behavior should be based effectually on sympathy, education, and social ties and needs; no religious basis is necessary. ... “Some theists say that ethics cannot do without religion because the very meaning of ‘good’ is nothing other than ‘what God approves’.

What do Socrates and euthyphro agree on?

Socrates has Euthyphro agree with him that there must be one form or standard by which everything holy is holy and everything unholy , by contrast with the holy, is unholy. That is, all holy deeds must be holy by virtue of some feature or other that all holy deeds share in common.

When euthyphro says that something is good if it is loved by the gods Socrates responds by saying that?

Euthyphro proposes that to say that something is pious , is to say that the gods love it or approve of it (Anything that the gods approve is pious). He thinks this because one action that is pious is giving offerings and sacrifices to the gods, it is pious because the gods like it.

What is euthyphro dilemma essay?

The Euthyphro problem is a dilemma that seeks to delineate the relationship between God and piety . ... To argue that God loves something because it is pious contradicts theists’ belief that, God is the foundation of morality and ethics.

What bias do you seek?

So when Socrates asks, “Whose bias do you seek”, we are meant to infer that everything that we read and hear has a bias about it, trying to influence us to join one side or the other . Jay-Z then continues to say, “all for Plato”, which is a reference to Plato’s belief in the afterlife and the soul.

What is Socrates criticism of piety is what all the gods love?

Piety is what all the gods love; impiety is what they all hate . Socrates’ reply (p. 7): Is the pious loved by the gods because it is pious, or is it pious because it is loved by the gods?

Do you think that there is a clear definition of piety that euthyphro could have presented that would have satisfied Socrates?

Socrates rejects this because it is not a definition; it is only an example or instance of piety. ... Socrates says it is not clear what makes anything dear to the gods, and what is dear to some of them ma not be dear to the others. Euthyphro then insists that piety is that which is pleasing to all of the gods .

What charge is euthyphro bringing forward and against whom?

Euthyphro: pressing charges against his father for murder . A servant killed another one of the slaves and so the father tied the servant up and left him in a ditch to ask for help and in the process the servant died. What is Socrates point at 6d-e?

Amira Khan
Author
Amira Khan
Amira Khan is a philosopher and scholar of religion with a Ph.D. in philosophy and theology. Amira's expertise includes the history of philosophy and religion, ethics, and the philosophy of science. She is passionate about helping readers navigate complex philosophical and religious concepts in a clear and accessible way.