Federal Election Commission that held that corporations could be banned from making electioneering communications. The Court upheld the reporting and disclaimer requirements for independent expenditures and electioneering communications.
What was the outcome of Citizens United v Federal Election Commission 2010 quizlet?
The Court ruled, 5-4, that the First Amendment prohibits limits on corporate funding of independent broadcasts in candidate elections . The justices said that the government's rationale for the limits on corporate spending—to prevent corruption—was not persuasive enough to restrict political speech.
What is the significance of the 2010 Supreme Court decision Citizens United v Federal Election Commission quizlet?
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), is a US constitutional law case, in which the United States Supreme Court held that the First Amendment prohibits the government from restricting political independent expenditures by corporations, associations, or labor unions .
What happened in the Citizens United case?
In Citizens United v. FEC, the Supreme Court asserted that corporations are people and removed reasonable campaign contribution limits, allowing a small group of wealthy donors and special interests to use dark money to influence elections.
What is the FEC and what does it do?
The Federal Election Commission enforces federal campaign finance laws, including monitoring donation prohibitions, and limits and oversees public funding for presidential campaigns.
What was the decision in Baker v Carr quizlet?
Terms in this set (2)
Decision: The Warren Court reached a 6-2 verdict in favor of Baker . A lack of political question, previous court intervention in apportionment affairs and equal protection under the 14th amendment gave the court enough reason to rule on legislative apportionment.
What did the Supreme Court decide in the case of mccutcheon V FEC quizlet?
The district court held that the aggregate limit served government interests by preventing corruption or the appearance of corruption and was set at a reasonable limit. You just studied 10 terms!
What is the significance of Citizens United v Federal Election Commission quizlet?
Decided in 2010, in a 5-to-4 decision, the Supreme Court held that corporate funding of independent political broadcasts in candidate elections cannot be limited , because doing so would violate the First Amendment.
What was the effect of the Supreme Court's ruling in Citizens United v Federal Election Commission?
The ruling effectively freed labor unions, trust funds, and corporations to spend money on electioneering communications and to directly advocate for the election or defeat of candidates.
What was the main idea of the ruling Buckley v Valeo quizlet?
Terms in this set (13) A 1976 case in which the Supreme Court struck down the portion of the Federal Election Campaign Act that set limits on the amount of money individuals could contribute to their own campaigns . The opinion of the majority was that setting such limits was a violation of free speech.
Did Citizens United created Super PACs?
Super PACs were made possible by two judicial decisions in 2010: the aforementioned Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission and, two months later, Speechnow.org v. FEC.
Can corporations donate to PACs?
Corporations may make donations to Political Action Committees (PACs); PACs generally have strict limits on their ability to advocate on behalf of specific parties or candidates, or even to coordinate their activities with political campaigns. PACs are subject to disclosure requirements at the federal and state levels.
Can corporations donate to political campaigns?
Campaigns may not accept contributions from the treasury funds of corporations, labor organizations or national banks. ... A campaign may, however, accept contributions from PACs established by corporations, labor organizations, incorporated membership organizations, trade associations and national banks.
What power does the FEC have?
The Federal Election Commission (FEC) is the independent regulatory agency charged with administering and enforcing the federal campaign finance law. The FEC has jurisdiction over the financing of campaigns for the U.S. House, Senate, Presidency and the Vice Presidency.
Why is the FEC important?
The mission of the FEC is to protect the integrity of the federal campaign finance process by providing transparency and fairly enforcing and administering federal campaign finance laws.
