This case made it possible for unrepresented voters to have their districts redrawn by federal courts , initiating a decade of lawsuits that would eventually result in a redrawing of the nation's political map.
How did Baker v Carr impact the United States?
Baker v. Carr (1962) was a landmark case concerning re-apportionment and redistricting. The United States Supreme Court ruled that federal courts could hear and rule on cases in which plaintiffs allege that re-apportionment plans violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment .
What is the significance of Baker v Carr?
Carr, (1962), U.S. Supreme Court case that forced the Tennessee legislature to reapportion itself on the basis of population . Traditionally, particularly in the South, the populations of rural areas had been overrepresented in legislatures in proportion to those of urban and suburban areas.
What were the significant facts of Baker v Carr 1961 quizlet?
Charles W. Baker and other Tennessee citizens alleged that a 1901 law designed to apportion the seats for the state's General Assembly was virtually ignored . Baker's suit detailed how Tennessee's reapportionment efforts ignored significant economic growth and population shifts within the state.
What did Baker v Carr do quizlet?
Issue: Charles Baker brought to light apportionment laws being ignored by the state of Tennessee . Court gained power to rule on apportionment laws. ... Bicameral states became equally apportioned.
What did the Supreme Court decide in Baker v Carr 1961 quizlet?
The Supreme Court decided for Baker. They ruled that federal courts have the authority to enforce the 14th amendment if the state legislative districts are disproportionately populated.
What amendment is Baker v Carr?
Brennan concluded that the Fourteenth Amendment equal protection issues which Baker and others raised in this case merited judicial evaluation.
What was the majority opinion in Baker v Carr?
Justice Brennan wrote the majority opinion of the court, essentially stating that dilution of votes was, in fact, denying the residents of Tennessee equal protection of the Fourteenth Amendment . Justice Douglas wrote a concurring opinion, stating that voters should have a full constitutional value of their vote.
Which of the following best describes the holding in Baker v Carr?
Terms in this set (10)
Which of the following best describes the holding in Baker v. Carr (1961)? Unequal representation of citizens in legislative districts is unconstitutional and may be reviewed by the courts .
What impact did the decision in Baker v Carr 1962 have on congressional redistricting quizlet?
The ruling was significant in the area of redistricting and racial gerrymandering. The court ruled in a 5-4 decision that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause .
How did the Baker v Carr case change the Supreme Court quizlet?
Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case that retreated from the Court's political question doctrine, deciding that redistricting (attempts to change the way voting districts are delineated) issues present justiciable questions , thus enabling federal courts to intervene in ...
What important principle did the Supreme Court established in the cases of Baker v Carr and Reynolds v Sims?
Sims (1964), using the Supreme Court's precedent set in Baker v. Carr (1962), Warren held that representation in state legislatures must be apportioned equally on the basis of population rather than geographical areas, remarking that “legislators represent people, not acres or trees. ” In...
Why did the US Supreme Court rule against the state of Tennessee in Baker v Carr quizlet?
Why did the US Supreme Court rule against the state of Tennessee in Baker v. Carr? Tennessee had discriminated in favor of city voters over rural voters . Tennessee had not redistricted since 1901, keeping rural districts in power.
What is the significance of the Supreme Court case Baker v Carr quizlet?
Terms in this set (7)
What is the significance of Baker v Carr.? The Court held that that redistricting qualifies as a justiciable question, thus enabling federal courts to hear redistricting cases .
What was the result of the Supreme Court decision on Citizens United v FEC quizlet?
The Court ruled, 5-4, that the First Amendment prohibits limits on corporate funding of independent broadcasts in candidate elections . The justices said that the government's rationale for the limits on corporate spending—to prevent corruption—was not persuasive enough to restrict political speech.
What were the significant facts of Shaw v Reno 1993 quizlet?
The court ruled in a 5-4 decision that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause . -The court ruled in a 5-4 decision that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause.
