In the study and teaching of rhetoric and argumentation, the term Rogerian argument was popularized in the 1970s and 1980s by the 1970 textbook Rhetoric: Discovery and Change by the University of Michigan professors Richard E. Young, Alton L. Becker, and Kenneth L. Pike.
Who created Rogerian argument?
Developed by psychotherapist Carl Rogers and adapted to rhetoric by writing scholars Young, Becker, and Pike, the speaker seeks compromise, acknowledging positive aspects of each party’s argument to arrive at a mutually-beneficial solution to an issue.
Where did the Rogerian argument come from?
The Rogerian model of argument was adapted from the work of American psychologist Carl Rogers by the composition scholars Richard Young, Alton Becker, and Kenneth Pike in their textbook “Rhetoric: Discovery and Change” (1970).
When would you use a Rogerian argument?
Rogerian arguments are oftentimes used in essays such as position papers . One advantage of using Rogerian argumentation is that the writer or speaker gains the attention of the audience and prevents them from immediately arguing in opposition.
What are Rogerian arguments based on?
The Rogerian argument finds that middle ground. Based on the work of psychologist Carl Rogers (pictured on the right), a Rogerian argument focuses on finding a middle ground between the author and the audience.
How do you end a Rogerian argument?
The conclusion of an essay includes a summary of your paper. For a Rogerian article, you need to concisely present a review of the sturdiest points from both sides of the argument and come up with a resolution which satisfies both sides of the argument.
What are the two steps to a Rogerian argument?
- I. Introduction. Discuss the issue, what’s at stake and any context required for your readers to understand the argument.
- II. Explain the Opposing View. ...
- III. Describe Your Views. ...
- IV. Find Common Ground. ...
- V. Offer a Compromise.
What are the four parts to a standard Rogerian argument?
A Rogerian argument typically includes four parts: an introduction that includes the full argumentative landscape , with all positions fairly represented in such a way that the writer demonstrates understanding of and respect for the range of perspectives involved; a rehearsal of situations in which the writer can ...
What are the four claims for written argument?
Arguments can be divided into four general components: claim, reason, support, and warrant . Claims are statements about what is true or good or about what should be done or believed. Claims are potentially arguable.
How many paragraphs are in a Rogerian argument?
As opposed to the traditional 5-paragraph essay, which has three main points as the body paragraphs, the Rogerian essay focuses on trying to work out the main arguments of each side. The first body paragraph should focus on one side of the argument, and the second paragraph should focus on the other side.
What is the difference between classical and Rogerian argument?
Traditional Argument: Writer states the claim and gives reasons to prove it. Writer refutes the opponent by showing what is wrong or invalid. Rogerian Argument: The writer states opponent’s claim to demonstrate understanding and shows how its valid .
What is an invitational argument?
Invitational Argument – invites others to explore or “enter a space of mutual regard ” (not aiming to win).
Why is the Toulmin method so successful?
The Toulmin model is important because it allows you to evaluate, in detail , how well each component of your argument is working, both in isolation and in conjunction with the other components.
What are the Rogerian techniques?
Rogerian therapy, created by Carl Rogers, is a therapeutic technique in which the client takes an active, autonomous role in therapy sessions . It is based on the idea that the client knows what is best, and that the therapist’s role is to facilitate an environment in which the client can bring about positive change.
What did Carl Rogers notice about the way people would argue?
In short, Rogers noticed that when people argue, they tend to make judgments about their opponents’ positions before they really understand them .
What is a Toulmin argument?
Toulmin, the Toulmin method is a style of argumentation that breaks arguments down into six component parts: claim, grounds, warrant, qualifier, rebuttal, and backing . ... It is, in other words, the main argument. The grounds of an argument are the evidence and facts that help support the claim.
