Why Was The Milgram Experiment Unethical?

by | Last updated on January 24, 2024

, , , ,

The experiment was deemed unethical, because the participants were led to believe that they were administering shocks to real people . The participants were unaware that the learner was an associate of Milgram’s. However, Milgram argued that deception was necessary to produce the desired outcomes of the experiment.

Did Milgram break ethical guidelines?

He concluded that under the right circumstances ordinary people will obey unjust orders. Milgram’s study has been heavily criticised for breaking numerous ethical guidelines, including: deception, right to withdraw and protection from harm .

What is the major problem with the original Milgram study?

What is a major problem with the original Milgram study? Milgram lied to his respondents, making his study borderline unethical . What is the major flaw in the Asch conformity study? Asch ignored the importance of several factors influencing conformity- race, class, and gender.

What did we learn from Milgram experiment?

“What Milgram’s obedience studies revealed above all was the sheer power of social pressure . ... The fact that recent studies have replicated Milgram’s findings demonstrates that Milgram had “identified one of the universals or constants of social behavior, spanning time and place.”

What did Milgram conclude from his experiment?

Social psychologist Stanley Milgram researched the effect of authority on obedience . He concluded people obey either out of fear or out of a desire to appear cooperative–even when acting against their own better judgment and desires.

What was the most serious charge leveled against the Milgram experiment?

One of the more serious charges leveled against Milgram’s paper was the original sin of social science research: sample bias .

What ethic was violated by Milgram?

The ethical issues involved with the Milgram experiment are as follows: deception, protection of participants involved, and the right to withdrawal . The experiment was deemed unethical, because the participants were led to believe that they were administering shocks to real people.

Is the Milgram experiment accurate?

In the 1960s, Stanley Milgram’s electric-shock studies showed that people will obey even the most abhorrent of orders. In the most well-known variation of the experiment, a full 65 percent of people went all the way . ...

What was Milgram’s hypothesis?

The hypothesis tested in the Milgram experiment was that, under the right circumstances, people would follow the directions of an authority figure to the extent of harming or even killing other people .

How do you feel about the Milgram experiment?

Milgram was horrified by the results of the experiment. In the “remote condition” version of the experiment described above, 65 percent of the subjects (26 out of 40) continued to inflict shocks right up to the 450-volt level , despite the learner’s screams, protests, and, at the 330-volt level, disturbing silence.

How long did the Milgram experiment last?

Milgram experiment, 50 years on. “The experiment requires that you continue. It is absolutely essential that you continue. You have no other choice, you must go on.”

What are the four factors that influence obedience according to Milgram?

  • Commands were given by an authority figure rather than another volunteer.
  • The experiments were done at a prestigious institution.
  • The authority figure was present in the room with the subject.
  • The learner was in another room.
  • The subject did not see other subjects disobeying commands.

What were the criticisms of Milgram’s research?

The modern criticisms include: When a participant hesitated in applying electric shocks, the actor playing the role of experimenter was meant to stick to a script of four escalating verbal “prods” . In fact, he frequently improvised, inventing his own terms and means of persuasion.

What was the deception in the Milgram experiment quizlet?

The participants were deceived: they were lead to believe that the shocks were real, that the confederate was real and that the drawing of lots was also real . The right to withdraw was given but due to the prompts given by the experimenter, the participants felt obliged to stay.

How does the presence of observers affect a person’s performance?

How does the presence of observers affect a person’s performance? It improves performance on easy tasks and hinders a person’s performance on difficult tasks .

What influenced Milgram?

During his graduate studies, Milgram had spent a year working as a research assistant to Solomon Asch who was interested in conformity in social groups. ... Milgram was inspired by the study and went on to perform a similar experiment that would make him famous.

Amira Khan
Author
Amira Khan
Amira Khan is a philosopher and scholar of religion with a Ph.D. in philosophy and theology. Amira's expertise includes the history of philosophy and religion, ethics, and the philosophy of science. She is passionate about helping readers navigate complex philosophical and religious concepts in a clear and accessible way.