How Do You Write A Systematic Review Discussion?

1. Summary of main findings.
2. Interpretation of main findings (don’t repeat results)
3. Strengths and weaknesses.
4. Comparison with previous review findings or general literature.
5. The degree to which the review answers the research question.
6. Whether the hypothesis was confirmed.

How long should a discussion be in a systematic review?

Generally the length of the ‘Discussion ‘ section should not exceed the sum of other sections (ıntroduction, material and methods, and results), and it should be completed

within 6–7 paragraphs

.. Each paragraph should not contain more than 200 words, and hence words should be counted repeteadly.

How do you write an introduction for a systematic review?

It should include the rationale and objectives of the review, the inclusion/exclusion of the criteria, methods for locating studies, quality assessment methods, data extraction methods, data synthesis methods,etc. Register your protocol.

Review the literature to search for studies

.

How do you write a systematic review step by step?

1. Formulate a question.
2. Develop protocol.
3. Conduct search.
4. Select studies and assess study quality.
5. Extract data and analyze/summarize and synthesize relevant studies.
6. Interpret results.

How do you write a good discussion section?

A good discussion section includes

analysis of any unexpected findings

. This paragraph should begin with a description of the unexpected finding, followed by a brief interpretation as to why you believe it appeared and, if necessary, its possible significance in relation to the overall study.

What is the first stage of systematic review?

Systematic review/meta-analysis steps include

development of research question and its validation

, forming criteria, search strategy, searching databases, importing all results to a library and exporting to an excel sheet, protocol writing and registration, title and abstract screening, full-text screening, manual …

What is the aim of a systematic review?

Systematic reviews aim

to identify, evaluate, and summarize the findings of all relevant individual studies over a health-related issue

, thereby making the available evidence more accessible to decision makers.

What is a systematic literature review and how do I do one?

A systematic literature review (SLR)

identifies, selects and critically appraises research in order to answer a clearly formulated question

(Dewey, A. & Drahota, A. 2016). The systematic review should follow a clearly defined protocol or plan where the criteria is clearly stated before the review is conducted.

How do you do a systematic search?

1. Determine a clear and focused question.
2. Describe the articles that can answer the question.
3. Decide which key concepts address the different elements of the question.
4. Decide which elements should be used for the best results.
5. Choose an appropriate database and interface to start with.

What is an example of discussion?

An example of a discussion is

when two or more people disagree and decide to sit down and talk out their different opinions

. … Conversation or debate concerning a particular topic. There was then a long discussion of whether to capitalize words like “east”. This topic is not open to discussion.

How do you start a discussion?

1. Refer to questions you distributed. …
2. Make a list of key points. …
3. Use a partner activity. …
4. Use a brainstorming activity. …
5. Pose an opening question and give students a few minutes to record an answer. …
6. Divide students into small groups to discuss a specific question or issue.

How do you write results?

The results section

should always be written in the past tense

. A section describing results [a.k.a., “findings”] is particularly necessary if your paper includes data generated from your own research.

What is a protocol for a systematic review?

A systematic review protocol

describes the rationale, hypothesis, and planned methods of the review

. It should be prepared before a review is started and used as a guide to carry out the review.

Which of the following is a benefit of systematic review?

The BMJ list the following as key advantages of a systematic review:

The methods that scientists use to find and select studies reduce bias and are more likely to produce reliable and accurate conclusions

. A review summarizes findings from multiple studies.

What defines a systematic review?

A systematic review is a

review of a clearly formulated question that uses systematic and reproducible methods to identify, select and critically appraise all relevant research

, and to collect and analyse data from the studies that are included in the review.