What Does Thrasymachus Mean By Saying Justice Is The Advantage Of The Stronger What Argument Does Socrates Make Against This?

by | Last updated on January 24, 2024

, , , ,

Thrasymachus is the only real opposition to Socrates. Thrasymachus believes firmly that “

justice is to the advantage of the stronger

.” Sophists

Who says justice is the advantage of the stronger?

Thus, Socrates, injustice on a sufficiently large scale is a stronger, freer, and a more masterful thing than justice, and, as I said in the beginning, it is the advantage of the stronger that is the just, while the unjust is what profits man’s self and is for his advantage.

What does Thrasymachus mean about justice?

According to this interpretation, Thrasymachus is

a relativist who denies that justice is anything beyond obedience to existing laws

. … Thrasymachus therefore turns out to be an ethical egoist who stresses that justice is the good of another and thus incompatible with the pursuit of one’s self-interest.

Who does Thrasymachus believe should rule the city?

19). By declaring his views on justice, Thrasymachus asserts that those who act just or believe in justice are the ones at loss, as they receive no benefit.

Justice according

to him is solely for the ruler, who rules the city. Unlike Socrates, Thrasymachus claims that there is no advantage for the weaker to be just.

What is justice according to Socrates?

Socrates seeks to define justice as

one of the cardinal human virtues

, and he understands the virtues as states of the soul. So his account of what justice is depends upon his account of the human soul. According to the Republic, every human soul has three parts: reason, spirit, and appetite.

What does Socrates say about virtue?

Based upon first-hand knowledge of the Greek texts, my thesis is as follows: man’s virtue, according to Socrates, is

wisdom (skill or knowledge-how) to act effectively or correctly in a given situ- ation, grounded in and based upon absolutely certain knowledge

(intellec- tual knowledge-that) .

Does Socrates agree with glaucon?

Socrates said that he believed justice falls into the second category; according to him justice is good intrinsically and instrumentally. … Glaucon argued that,

by nature, doing injustice is good

but the law can force you to act against that. According to Glaucon, justice is naturally bad and injustice is naturally good.

What theory does Callicles defend?

In the dialogue named for his teacher, Callicles argues the position of

an oligarchic amoralist

, stating that it is natural and just for the strong to dominate the weak and that it is unfair for the weak to resist such oppression by establishing laws to limit the power of the strong.

Who is a just person according to Plato?

Plato strikes an analogy between the

human

organism on the one hand and social organism on the other. Human organism according to Plato contains three elements-Reason, Spirit and Appetite. An individual is just when each part of his or her soul performs its functions without interfering with those of other elements.

What was Socrates reply to Thrasymachus?

Thrasymachus says

that a ruler cannot make mistakes

. Thrasymachus’ argument is that might makes right. But Socrates rebuts this argument by demonstrating that, as a ruler, the ruler’s chief interest ought to be the interests of his subjects, just as a physician’s interest ought to be the welfare of his patient.

What are the 3 parts to the state in Plato’s ideal society?

Paralleling with the three parts of the soul, the three parts of Plato’s ideal society are

guardians, auxiliaries, and craftsmen

.

What is Socrates counterexample to Cephalus definition of justice?

His definition of justice is an attempt to articulate the basic Hesiodic conception: that justice means living up to your legal obligations and being honest. Socrates defeats this formulation with a counterexample:

returning a weapon to a madman

.

How does Socrates refute Polemarchus definition of justice?

Polemarchus agrees and then argues that justice may be defined as giving everyone what is “appropriate” to him and that it would be unjust to return a sword to a friend who is in a crazed condition. … But again, Socrates demurs: He argues that

returning evil for evil does not constitute justice

.

What is the main point of Plato’s Republic?

Plato’s strategy in The Republic is to

first explicate the primary notion of societal, or political, justice

, and then to derive an analogous concept of individual justice. In Books II, III, and IV, Plato identifies political justice as harmony in a structured political body.

What is the highest virtue according to Socrates?

In Ancient Greece commonly accepted

virtues

included courage, temperance, prudence, and justice.

Socrates

held

virtue

to be the

greatest

good in life because it alone was capable of securing ones happiness.

What kind of knowledge of virtue Socrates is looking for in the Meno?

This suggestion puzzles Meno, and Socrates explains that, while they had been looking for virtue as a kind of

teachable knowledge

, virtuous men’s good deeds could equally well be the result not of knowledge but of “true opinion.”

Amira Khan
Author
Amira Khan
Amira Khan is a philosopher and scholar of religion with a Ph.D. in philosophy and theology. Amira's expertise includes the history of philosophy and religion, ethics, and the philosophy of science. She is passionate about helping readers navigate complex philosophical and religious concepts in a clear and accessible way.