Principal Reynolds was
concerned that people would be able to identify the pregnant teens who were interviewed for one of the articles
. He was also concerned that, in a separate article, a father who was criticized was not given the opportunity to respond to the accusations made against him in the article.
What did Principal Reynolds do to fix the problem?
What did Principal Reynolds do to fix the problem? Did he have any other choices?
Principal Reynolds told the newspaper sponsor to remove the pages that had the articles about pregnancy and divorce
. 4.
Do you think Principal Reynolds was justified in deleting the two pages of the paper?
Furthermore, the court concluded that Reynolds was justified in deleting two full pages of the newspaper, instead of deleting only the pregnancy and divorce stories or requiring that those stories be modified to
address his
concerns, based on his “reasonable belief that he had to make an immediate decision and that …
What does the court mean by legitimate pedagogical concerns?
The “legitimate pedagogical concerns” the Hazelwood decision listed as grounds for censorship include: • Material that is “
ungrammatical, poorly written, inadequately researched, biased or prejudiced, vulgar or profane or unsuitable for immature audiences
.”
What was the issue in Hazelwood v Kuhlmeier?
In Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier, 484 U.S. 260 (1988), the Supreme Court
held that schools may restrict what is published in student newspapers if the papers have not been established as public forums
.
How did the court distinguish between its decision in the Tinker case and the present case?
The court distinguished its decision between the Tinker case and the Hazelwood case
because Tinkers case gave students the right to express their political opinions about the Vietnam War and Hazelwood was a part of the school curriculum for teaching and learning
.
What conditions have to exist for a principal to exercise censorship of the student press according to the Hazelwood decision?
School officials are allowed to censor student speech, including a student publication that is curricular and not a public forum, when they can demonstrate that their censorship is
“reasonably related to legitimate pedagogical [educational] concerns
.” If censorship serves no valid educational purpose, it is prohibited.
Why did the newspaper adviser give the paper to Principal Reynolds for review?
The newspaper advisor gave the paper to Principal Reynolds to review prior to
publication because it was standard procedure
. … Principal Reynolds could have had students revise the stories prior to publication, but that would most likely have delayed the paper’s publication until after the end of the school year.
What did the Supreme Court decide in Vernonia v Acton quizlet?
(1985) Supreme Court case that was before Acton and influenced the 1995 decision. The court decided 6-3 that
searching a public high school student’s purse for drug paraphernalia was a legal search/seizure under the Fourth Amendment
.
Why is Hazelwood v Kuhlmeier a landmark case?
Kuhlmeier et al., 484 U.S. 260 (1988), was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that
held that public school curricular student newspapers that have not been established as forums for student expression are subject to a lower level of First Amendment protection than independent student
…
What are pedagogical concerns?
Anything that relates to teaching is pedagogical
. … The adjective pedagogical, pronounced “peh-duh-GAH-gi-cal,” comes from the Greek word paidagōgikos meaning “teacher.” If it’s pedagogical, it concerns teaching, from lesson plans to approaches to teaching, even how the classroom looks.
Are not automatically coextensive with the rights of adults in other settings?
The Supreme Court has held that the
constitutional rights of students in public school
are not automatically coextensive with the rights of adults in other settings and that the rights of students must be applied in light of the special characteristics of the school environment.
Who is Cathy Kuhlmeier?
Cathy Kuhlmeier, subject of the
Hazelwood
School District v. Kuhlmeier Supreme Court case, discussed being on the side of students in K-12. … When Kuhlmeier and her peers attemped to publish stories about abortion and divorce in their school newspaper, their principal rejected the stories.
Can a principal censor a school newspaper?
Kuhlmeier, the high court ruled that school officials can censor school-sponsored publications
if their decision is “reasonably related to a legitimate pedagogical purpose
.” This means school officials must show that they have a reasonable educational reason for censoring the material.
What are the 2 Supreme Court cases that are significant to high school journalism?
- New York Times Co. vs. United States (1971)
- Gertz vs. Robert Welch, Inc. (1974) …
- Curtis Publishing v. Butts (1966) ” ” …
- New York Times Co. v. Sullivan (1964) …
- Chandler v. Florida (1981) ” ” …
- Cohen v. Cowles Media Co. (1982) …
- Branzburg v. Hayes (1971) …
- Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier (1988) …
Who won the case of Hazelwood v Kuhlmeier?
Decision: In 1988,
the Supreme Court
, with one vacancy, handed down a 5-3 decision in favor of the school. The Court reversed the appellate court, and said that public schools do not have to allow student speech if it is inconsistent with the schools’ educational mission.
