-“The Saints” and “The Roughnecks” study shows
the importance of linking the macro and micro factors together
. -The Saints were from upper-middle-class families, whereas the Roughnecks were from a lower socioeconomic background. Chambliss found that neither group was more delinquent than the other.
How did the community view the Saints and the roughnecks differently?
When it came to the total number of illegal acts, the Saints were more delinquent than the Roughnecks. However, the Saints were viewed by the community, teachers, and the police as good kids with bright futures. On the other hand, the Roughnecks were viewed
as troublemakers and future criminals
.
What did Chambliss discover about the Saints and roughnecks?
Chambliss and the Saints and Roughnecks
The six boys in the other group, the Roughnecks, came from lower-class families in poorer neighborhoods. … Chambliss discovered
that the boys’ social class had much to do with the public’s perception of them and the ways the public perceived their acts of deviance.
What theory does Chambliss use in the Saints and the roughnecks?
– Chambliss explained that the
differential treatment of the two groups was related to access to automobiles
and how parents labeled their deviant sons. Parents of the Saints group labeled their sons as engaging in harmless pranks, whereas the parents of Roughnecks labeled their sons’ behavior as criminal.
What was the main theoretical perspective used by Chambliss in his work with the Saints and roughnecks?
Using
the labeling perspective
, William Chambliss focused on different attitudes toward students by teachers, based on social class. In his research of “The Saints and The Roughnecks,” school official’s reactions to two separate groups of boys who committed the same amount of deviance were completely different (1973).
How did the Saints minimize their visibility?
How did the saints minimize their visibility?
The saints had access to automobiles
.
What research methods did Chambliss use?
What methodology did Chambliss use in this study? Chambliss used
the observation method to compare
and contrast the Saints’ and Roughnecks’ behavior. He observed the Saints and the Roughnecks for over two years.
What kinds of behaviors did the Roughnecks engage in?
The Roughnecks, then, engaged mainly in three types of delinquency:
theft, drinking and fighting
. Although community members perceived that this gang of kids was delinquent, they mistakenly believed that their ille- gal activities were primarily drinking, fighting and being a nuisance to passersby.
Who defines deviance?
According to
sociologist William Graham Sumner
, deviance is a violation of established contextual, cultural, or social norms, whether folkways, mores, or codified law (1906). Put simply, deviance is the violation of a norm.
Who were the Saints sociology?
William J. Chambliss conducted a study of the Saints and the Roughnecks, two teenage delinquent groups. The Saints were
higher class individuals who were perceived as well dressed, highly achieving, diligent students
.
Which group is considered deviant the Saints or the Roughnecks explain why?
The Saints were
eight male high-school students
from middle-class backgrounds who were very delinquent, while the Roughnecks were six male students in the same high school who were also very delinquent but who came from poor, working-class families.
What does each theoretical perspective believe about where a society’s power lies?
What does each theoretical perspective believe about where a society’s power lies?
Functionalism states
that power comes from all of the parts of society working together (the contributions they make). … Symbolic Interactionism states that power lies in the symbolism that society chooses to believe in.
When an offender is motivated to choose a victim?
An
ordinary crime
can be a hate crime if the offender chooses a victim based on race, religion, ethnic group, national origin, or sexual orientation. They are sometimes referred to as bias crimes.
One theory is that class
influences the development of deviant
identity, the sense that one does not conform to or follow accepted norms of society. … Sociologists also consider the ways social class impacts deviance and crime rates. Data suggest that low-income people commit more crimes than wealthier people.
What’s the difference between primary and secondary deviance?
Primary deviance is seen to consist of deviant acts (with any amount of causes) before they are publicly labelled, and has ‘only marginal implications for the status and psychic structure of the person concerned’.
Secondary deviance is much more significant
because it alters a person’s self-regard and social roles.
symbolic interactionism
. relativist perspective foucsed on indiv. and meanings attached to objects, people, and interactions. what do label theories examine. social meaning of deviant labels, how those labels are understood, and how they impact the individuals to which they are applied.
