What argument did the university make in Regents v Bakke quizlet?
The court ruled in favor of Allan Bakke saying that racial quotas violated equal protection under the law in the 14th amendment
. The court ordered that Bakke be admitted to The University of California.
Which best explains why the Supreme Court's decision in Regents versus bake angered people on both sides of the affirmative action debate?
Bakke angered people on both sides of the affirmative action debate?
The Court agreed to allow increased use of racial preferences in college and medical school admissions only.
…
What happened in the case of Regents of the University of California v Bakke quizlet?
In Regents of University of California v. Bakke ,
the Supreme Court ruled that a university's use of racial quotas in its admissions process was unlawful
, but a school's use of “affirmative action” to accept more outvoted candidates was constitutional in some circumstances. You just studied 8 terms!
What did Bakke argue?
Bakke (1978), the Supreme Court ruled that
a university's use of racial “quotas” in its admissions process was unconstitutional
, but a school's use of “affirmative action” to accept more minority applicants was constitutional in some circumstances.
How did Regents v Bakke change affirmative action policies?
How did Regents v. Bakke change affirmative action policies?
It struck down the use of strict racial quotas. It ruled race could not be factored into admissions.
What argument did the university make in Regents v Bakke?
The court ruled in favor of Allan Bakke saying that racial quotas violated equal protection under the law in the 14th amendment
. The court ordered that Bakke be admitted to The University of California.
What was the decision in Baker v Carr quizlet?
Terms in this set (2)
Decision:
The Warren Court reached a 6-2 verdict in favor of Baker
. A lack of political question, previous court intervention in apportionment affairs and equal protection under the 14th amendment gave the court enough reason to rule on legislative apportionment.
What did the Supreme Court decide in Vernonia v Acton quizlet?
(1985) Supreme Court case that was before Acton and influenced the 1995 decision. The court decided 6-3 that
searching a public high school student's purse for drug paraphernalia was a legal search/seizure under the Fourth Amendment
.
Which best explains why the Supreme Court's decision in Plessy versus Ferguson was unconstitutional?
Which best explains why the Supreme Court's decision in Plessy v. Ferguson was unconstitutional?
Since segregation laws did not provide equal protections or liberties to non-whites, the ruling was not consistent with the 14th Amendment.
What did the Supreme Court determine was unconstitutional in Brown v Board of Education?
Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka was a landmark 1954 Supreme Court case in which the justices ruled unanimously that
racial segregation of children in public schools
was unconstitutional.
Who won the Bakke case?
Bakke decision, formally Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, ruling in which, on June 28, 1978, the U.S. Supreme Court declared affirmative action constitutional but invalidated the use of racial quotas.
Who is Allen Bakke?
Allan Bakke, a
white California man
who had twice unsuccessfully applied for admission to the medical school, filed suit against the university. Citing evidence that his grades and test scores surpassed those of many minority students who had been accepted for admission, Bakke charged that…
What did Proposition 209 do?
Proposition 209 (also known as the California Civil Rights Initiative or CCRI) is a California ballot proposition which, upon approval in November 1996, amended the state constitution to prohibit state governmental institutions from considering race, sex, or ethnicity, specifically in the areas of public employment, …
Why was it decided to lower the voting age to 18 from 21 quizlet?
Why was it decided to lower the voting age to 18 from 21? It was unusual that 18-year-olds could be drafted but could not vote.
to have a state law declared unconstitutional.
Who hears evidence and offers a verdict?
The judge
makes a decision or the jury gives its verdict, based on the testimony and other evidence presented during trial. 8.
What was the important precedent set by the Gitlow v New York case?
What was the important precedent set by the Gitlow v. New York case?
The equal protection clause was dropped from the Fourteenth Amendment.
… Fourteenth Amendment rights were incorporated into the Fifteenth Amendment.
