Supporters of the bombings generally believe that they prevented an invasion of the Japanese mainland, saving more lives than they took by doing so. Opponents contend, among other arguments,
that the bombings were unnecessary to win the war or that they constituted a war crime or genocide
.
What arguments could be made for using atomic bombs to end the war what arguments could be made against using atomic weapons in the war?
Arguments that could be made for using atomic bombs to end the war: 1.
The loss of the life would have been greater if the conventional invasion of Japan occurred
. 2. [ Japan seemed unwilling to surrender even in the face of almost certain defeat without an overwhelming show of force. ]
What argument did people who opposed using the atomic bomb on Japan make to support their point of view?
Supporters of the bombings generally believe that they prevented an invasion of the Japanese mainland, saving more lives than they took by doing so. Opponents contend, among other arguments,
that the bombings were unnecessary to win the war or that they constituted a war crime or genocide
.
What was the strongest argument in favor of dropping the atomic bomb on Japan Why?
As such, some historians have argued that the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was
justified because it forced the Japanese leadership to surrender
, which ultimately saved the lives of many Japanese people.
What happened to Hiroshima after the bomb hit quizlet?
Describe what happened to the city after the bomb hit?
The devastation was beyond anything seen before. The city was immediately flattened.
What were the arguments against dropping the atomic bomb?
Others have argued against the use of the bombs, with evidence such as:
it was not needed, it was inhumane and it led to the modern atomic age and threat of nuclear war
. Still others argue that perhaps the first bomb used against Hiroshima was justified but that the second used against Nagasaki was not.
Why didn’t America drop the atomic bomb on Germany?
Simply put, Germany was incapable of developing an atomic bomb during World War II.
They did not have the people
. They did not have the cooperation among the people they did have. They did not have the money.
Did America need to drop the atomic bomb?
The accepted wisdom in the United States for the last 75 years has been that dropping the bombs
on Hiroshima on Aug.
6, 1945, and on Nagasaki three days later was the only way to end the World War II without an invasion that would have cost hundreds of thousands of American and perhaps millions of Japanese lives.
When did Japan surrender and what is that day called?
Victory over Japan Day (V-J Day) would officially be celebrated in the United States on the day formal surrender documents were signed aboard the USS Missouri in Tokyo Bay:
September 2, 1945
.
What were the reasons the bomb should have not been used on Japan?
What were the reasons the bomb should not have been used on Japan? The reason japan should not have been bombed is
because many civilian lives were taken who had nothing to do with the war
. The U.S. dropping the bomb on japan killed many people and left their land in shambles.
What were the arguments for and against a demonstration of the bomb in Tokyo Harbor?
–
Japan was ready to call for a truce and a demonstration would be enough for the Japanese authorities to decide to surrender
. The arguments against the demonstration of the bomb: – There were only two nuclear bombs ready and not using them effectively, Japanese might still think they have chance and continue the war.
What color was the Fat Man bomb?
Replica mockup of a Fat Man displayed in the National Museum of the United States Air Force, beside the Bockscar B-29 that dropped the original device –
black
liquid asphalt sealant was sprayed over the original bomb casing’s seams, simulated on the mockup.
Why did the United States drop a second atomic bomb on Japan quizlet?
The U.S decided to drop the two bombs on Japan
because Japan refused to surrender, causing the Pacific War to drag on
. The U.S offered a unconditional surrender known as the ‘Potsdam Declaration’ and said if they didn’t agree to it, they would face the Alternative of “Prompt and utter destruction” and Japan ignored it.
What were the long term effects of Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
Summary: The detonation of atomic bombs over Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945 resulted in horrific casualties. The long-term effects of
radiation exposure
also increased cancer rates in the survivors.
Was it OK to drop the atomic bomb?
“
No
.
The dropping of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima was justified at the time as being moral – in order to bring about a more rapid victory and prevent the deaths of more Americans. However, it was clearly not moral to use this weapon knowing that it would kill civilians and destroy the urban milieu.
Is there still radiation in Hiroshima?
The radiation in Hiroshima and Nagasaki today is
on a par
with the extremely low levels of background radiation (natural radioactivity) present anywhere on Earth. It has no effect on human bodies. … Most of those exposed to direct radiation within a one-kilometer radius died. Residual radiation was emitted later.
