What does Jackson name as the advantages of the Indian Removal Act for the United States?
Native American removal would reduce conflict between the federal and state governments
. It would allow white settlers to occupy more of the South and the West, presumably protecting from foreign invasion.
How did Andrew Jackson justify the Indian Removal Act?
President Andrew Jackson’s Message to Congress ‘On Indian Removal’ (1830) … Jackson declared that
removal would “incalculably strengthen the southwestern frontier
.” Clearing Alabama and Mississippi of their Indian populations, he said, would “enable those states to advance rapidly in population, wealth, and power.”
How does Jackson benefit politically from the Indian Removal Act?
Jackson backed the states. … To facilitate the removal,
Jackson induced Congress in 1830 to pass a bill empowering him to lay off new Indian homelands west of the Mississippi, exchange them for current tribal holdings, purchase the Indians’ capital improvements, and pay the costs of their westward transportation
.
What was a major reason for the Indian Removal Act of 1830?
A major reason for the Indian Removal Act of 1830 was
the Supreme Court ruling in 1823 of Johnson v. M’Intosh
.
What were some of the effects of the Indian Removal Act?
The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was signed into effect by President Jackson, which
allowed Native Americans to settle in land within state borders in exchange for unsettled land west of the Mississippi
. Many Native American tribes reacted peacefully, but many reacted violently.
Who benefited from the Indian Removal Act?
Most white Americans
supported the Removal Act, especially southerners who were eager to expand southward. Expansion south would be good for the country and the future of the country’s economy with the later introduction of cotton production in the south.
Did the Indian Removal Act violate the Constitution?
In 1828, Jackson was elected president. … Jackson backed an Indian removal bill in Congress. Members of Congress like Davy Crockett argued that
Jackson violated the Constitution by refusing to enforce treaties that guaranteed Indian land rights
. But Congress passed the removal law in the spring of 1830.
Who was against the Indian Removal Act?
The
legendary frontiersman and Tennessee congressman Davy Crockett
opposed the Indian Removal Act, declaring that his decision would “not make me ashamed in the Day of Judgment.” 4. In 1829, the Christian missionary Jeremiah Evarts published a series of newspaper articles that blasted U.S.
What were the immediate and long term effects of the Indian Removal Act?
2 Immediate Gains and Losses
The terms
“Trail of Tears” and “The Place Where They Cried”
refer to the suffering of Native Americans affected by the Indian Removal Act. It is estimated that the five tribes lost 1 in 4 of their population to cholera, starvation, cold and exhaustion during the move west.
Which of these best describes the outcome of the Indian Removal Act?
The act
removed territory from the Cherokee and auctioned it off to prospectors
. The act created a constitution for the five tribes that had been removed to Indian Territory.
What happened after the Indian Removal Act of 1830?
The Indian Removal Act was signed into law on May 28, 1830, by United States President Andrew Jackson. … The Cherokee worked together to stop this relocation, but were unsuccessful; they were eventually forcibly removed by the United States government in a march to the west that later became known as
the Trail of Tears
.
How long did the Indian Removal Act last?
Milestones:
1830–1860
.
What treaty did Andrew Jackson violate?
The United States solemnly guarantee to the Cherokee nation, all their lands not hereby ceded. **In
the Indian Removal Act
, the Cherokees never formally ceded or surrendered their lands. Jackson forced their removal, breaking this treaty.
How many Native American treaties were broken?
From 1778 to 1871, the United States government entered into
more than 500 treaties
with the Native American tribes; all of these treaties have since been violated in some way or outright broken by the US government, Native Americans and First Nations peoples are still fighting for their treaty rights in federal courts …
What were the consequences of the Indian Removal Act quizlet?
What were the consequences of the Indian Removal Act?
This force the Cherokees to go on a long hard journey from their homeland to Indian territory one fourths of their population died
and this was known as the trail of tears. Not all of the Cherokees moved west.
How did the two tribes attempt to resist the Indian Removal Act?
In a nutshell: the Choctaw were the first to sign a treaty of removal but some tribal members
resisted by staying behind under treaty provisions
; the Cherokee used legal means to resist removal; the Seminole who considered the treaty of removal illegitimate fought two wars of resistance; the Creek refused to leave …
