- The question or the legal issue before the court.
- The relevant facts of the case.
- The legal rule.
- Other considerations that may be brought before the court.
What are the 4 steps in legal reasoning?
I. Legal Reasoning – Generally
1)
Issue – What specifically is being debated
? 2) Rule – What legal rule governs this issue? 3) Facts – What are the facts relevant to this Rule? 4) Analysis – Apply the rule to the facts.
What are the components of good legal reasoning?
There are four basic components in legal reasoning which applies to legal process—
logic, Justice, experience and policy
.
What are the basic steps in legal reasoning?
- What are the key facts and issues?
- What rules of law apply to the case?
- How do the rules of law apply to the particular facts and circumstances of this case?
- What conclusion should be drawn or formed?
What are the 6 key aspects to legal thinking?
These six TLOs represent what a Bachelor of Laws graduate is expected ‘to know, understand and be able to do as a result of learning’.
knowledge (TLO1), ethics and professional responsibility (TLO2), thinking skills (TLO3), research skills (TLO4), communication and collaboration (TLO5), and self management (TLO6)
.
What are the types of reasoning?
Reasoning is the process of using existing knowledge to draw conclusions, make predictions, or construct explanations. Three methods of reasoning are the deductive, inductive, and abductive approaches.
What type of reasoning do lawyers use?
In this section we examine three forms of
legal reasoning
which are used by lawyers and judges in the common law. Inductive, deductive reasoning and reasoning by analogy. [U]ntil it is established what resemblances and differences are relevant, ‘Treat like cases alike’ must remain an empty form. case.
What are the 4 types of law?
Law is divided into four broad categories. These types of law are
tort law, contract law, property law and criminal law
.
What is legal argument?
A legal argument is
merely an argument using at least one law as a
.
reason in support of the conclusion
. Other reasons used to support the conclusion of a legal argument. include ethical reasons, religious reasons, economic reasons, and political (power) reasons.
Why are the steps of legal reasoning important?
Legal reasoning reveals why and how the court, lawyer or judge came to their decision or argument on the case. …
The relevant facts of the case
.
The legal rule
.
Other considerations that may be brought before the court
.
Which is an example of a statute?
A police officer pulls you over, and you are given a citation for violating the speed limit. You
have broken a vehicle and traffic law
. This law is established by legislature as a statute, or a law that is formally written and enacted. As a result, the law you broke was a statutory law.
How do you solve legal reasoning questions?
Follow the given steps while solving legal reasoning questions:
Read the entire passage thoroughly
. Focus on the facts and the conclusion. The questions will carry a situation different from the passage so the student needs to apply analogy and a draw an answer referring to the facts given in the passage.
What is a factor test law?
A factor test in the law
sets out a list of areas of inquiry a court must consider in determining whether a particular legal conclusion can be reached
.
What is IRAC method?
IRAC stands for the “
Issue, Rule, Application, Conclusion” structure of legal analysis
. An effective essay follows some form of the IRAC structure where it is organized around an “issue”, a “rule”, an “application”, and a “conclusion” for each and every issue and sub-issue identified as a legal problem.
What is the relation between law and morality?
Law and morality are intimately related to each other. Laws are generally based on
the moral principles of society
. Both regulate the conduct of the individual in society. They influence each other to a great extent.
How do you write a IRAC example?
- Issue: State the legal issue(s) to be discussed.
- Rule: State the relevant statutes and case law.
- Application: Apply the relevant rules to the facts that created the issue.
- Conclusion: State the most likely conclusions using the logic of the application section.
