How Do The Speeches Of Brutus And Antony Differ?

by | Last updated on January 24, 2024

, , , ,

The basic difference between the funeral speeches of Brutus and Antony is that

Brutus, characteristically, appeals to reason and logic, while Antony, characteristically, appeals to emotions

. Brutus is an introverted, solitary philosopher, and his speech to the citizens is totally in character.

How do the poetic forms of Brutus and Mark Antony’s speeches reflect their characters?

How do the poetic forms of Brutus’ and Mark Antony’s speeches reflect their characters? …

Brutus’ speech is written in prose

, which is used to show rational thought. Mark Antony’s speech uses blank verse, which matches his passion and emotion.

Why did Brutus speech fail compared to Antony’s speech?

Brutus tells them people then he had done no more to Caesar than they will do to him. Brutus’s speech was ineffective in

giving them reasons for Caesar’s ambition

. This gave Antony a large gap to turn the people against Brutus.

How does Brutus speech persuade the audience?

You might also want to include some notes as to why this is Logos, Pathos or Ethos. BRUTUS’ SPEECH: Brutus persuades his audience (common people) that

he had good and noble reasons to kill Caesar

. … Brutus uses Ethos in his speech to say to his audience “Believe me… I’m a good guy, I’m one of you” 1.

How were Brutus and Antony’s speeches similar?

In both speeches, the writers use ‘

threes

‘, this is where they string three words together, thus making them memorable. Brutus uses ‘friends, countrymen and lovers’ when he refers to the crowd, he uses lovers, meaning lovers of Rome. Antony uses a similar combination calling the crowd ‘friends Romans and countrymen.

What makes Antony’s speech persuasive?

Mark Antony is more persuasive than Brutus because

he creates and changes the mood of the speech to fit his purpose of inciting the crowd into violence

. Another example of Antony using glittering generalities is when he declares, “But yesterday the word of Caesar might/Have stood against the world.

Which reason explains the irony in Brutus speech best quizlet?

Which reason explains the irony in Brutus’ speech best?

The conspirators’ plot involves killing Caesar’s body, but not his spirit. The conspirator’s plot involves killing Caesar’s spirit, but not

his body.

What rhetorical devices did Brutus use?

Answer and Explanation: Brutus’s funeral speech in Julius Caesar includes three key rhetorical devices:

antithesis, parallelism, and rhetorical questions

.

Why is Brutus speech bad?

The main flaw in Brutus’ speech at Caesars funeral was that

his argument had only one source of proof

, his reputation. … During his address, Brutus only tries to emotionally involve the crowd once, when he tells them he loved Caesar, and was Caesars good friend, but he loved Rome more, and had no choice but to slay him.

What mode of persuasion does Antony use most successfully in his speech?

Particularly in Antony’s speech to the Romans. During Antony’s, he uses

emotional appeal twice

, loaded words

What rhetorical devices does Antony use in speech?

The most effective tool Marc Antony uses throughout his oration for Caesar is

repetition

, the most repeated phrases having to do with Caesar’s “ambition” and Brutus’ “honor.” The repetition of these sort of tropes is responsible for the sarcastic irony that eventually drips from Antony’s speech.

What was Mark Antony’s speech?

Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears; I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him.

What is the aim of Brutus speech?

The first to speak was Brutus, his purpose was

to mainly inform the crowd why the conspirators killed Caesar

. He also wanted to explain why Caesar …show more content… Antony starts off his speech the same way Brutus did, in Act III, Sc. 2 “Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears” (ln 70) .

Amira Khan
Author
Amira Khan
Amira Khan is a philosopher and scholar of religion with a Ph.D. in philosophy and theology. Amira's expertise includes the history of philosophy and religion, ethics, and the philosophy of science. She is passionate about helping readers navigate complex philosophical and religious concepts in a clear and accessible way.