When jurors are polled individually before group deliberations occur, what fraction of juries initially disagree on the verdict.
two out of three
.
When lawyers identify questions to ask potential jurors that will help them eliminate jurors with biased attitudes This is sometimes called?
The judge and/or attorneys will ask questions of the panel and base their decisions on whom to keep and whom to remove on the answers they get. The questioning process is called
voir dire. Jury
. When the process is complete, the 6 or 12 jurors who remain constitute the jury.
What is the most persuasive form of evidence presented in court?
There is now a wealth of evidence, from research conducted over several decades, suggesting that
eyewitness testimony
is probably the most persuasive form of evidence presented in court, but in many cases, its accuracy is dubious.
In terms of the legal system, authoritarian jurors are more likely to vote for conviction
in mock jury experiments
. Authoritarian beliefs may be more powerful determinants of decisions in death penalty trials than in noncapital trials.
What happens when judges instruct jurors to disregard inadmissible evidence quizlet?
Generally speaking, jurors will ignore inadmissible evidence when told by the judge to disregard that evidence.
increases the likelihood of a conviction on a subsequent charge
.
Why do jurors get dismissed?
If either lawyer believes there is information that suggests a juror is prejudiced about the case, he or she can ask the judge to dismiss that juror for cause. … In effect, they allow a lawyer to dismiss a juror because of
a belief that the juror will not serve the best interests of the client
.
Which is not a way to increase jurors understanding in court?
Remembering the unhappy times in our lives enhances contentment. Which is NOT a way to increase jurors’ understanding in court?
The judge should explain clearly the basic concepts when instructing the jury rather than using legal terminology
.
How accurate are eyewitness accounts?
Research has found that eyewitness-identification
testimony can be very unreliable
. … Although witnesses can often be very confident that their memory is accurate when identifying a suspect, the malleable nature of human memory and visual perception makes eyewitness testimony one of the most unreliable forms of evidence.
Can jurors touch evidence?
Passing evidence to the jury allows them to touch
, see, and potentially smell the evidence.
What percentage of eyewitness testimony is accurate?
In a recent review of the literature, the authors reported across 15 experiments, suspect identifications made with high confidence were, on average,
97 percent accurate
!
What are the challenges when being cross examined by defense counsel?
Attorneys use cross-examination to question the accuracy of the witness’s memory, explore the witness’s biases, and
challenge the witness’s ability to identify certain facts that they testified to
.
What does it mean when a prospective juror is challenged for cause?
The purpose of challenge for cause is
to screen out potential biases in juries
. The fundamental issue on challenges for cause is whether the accused can receive a fair trial pursuant to s. … some jurors may be incapable of setting aside this bias, despite trial safeguards, to render an impartial decision.
Why are some jury verdicts popular and others not?
Reasons for the popularity of jury verdicts:
It is seen that
some jury verdicts attracts the attention of the people but some does not
. … The verdict given by the jury members will create a sensation and will become more popular.
How does inadmissible evidence influence jurors decision making?
Aside from changing how individual jurors think about a case on their own, inadmissible evidence may also change how jury members talk about that case to one another during their deliberations. By
altering the deliberation process
, inadmissible evidence may indirectly affect a jury’s decisions.
In which of the following conditions would a defendant be judged more harshly quizlet?
In which of the following conditions would a defendant be judged more harshly?
When the defendant uses his or her attractiveness to commit a crime
. Research on inadmissible evidence indicates that: neither judges nor jurors are able to disregard inadmissible evidence.
What have some critics said about problem solving courts quizlet?
What is a criticism of problem-solving courts? One criticism is
that they are presided over by middle-class judges that may reflect middle-class values
. Meaning, they may be paternalistic over the offenders. They may also feel as if they are social workers instead of judges.
