What was the significance of the Bakke decision and the University of Michigan cases?
They forbade the use of racial quotas in school admissions
, but allowed some consideration of race in admissions decisions. There are still wide disparities in employment statistics between whites and Blacks in the U.S.
Which of the following are objections to affirmative action programs raised by consequentialist critics?
Which of the following objections to affirmative action programs is raised by consequentialist critics?
They mainly benefit middle-class rather than lower-class African Americans
. There are still wide disparities in employment statistics between whites and Blacks in the U.S.
What did the Supreme Court’s decision in Regents of the University of California v Bakke do quizlet?
In Regents of University of California v. Bakke , the Supreme Court ruled that
a university’s use of racial quotas in its admissions process was unlawful
, but a school’s use of “affirmative action” to accept more outvoted candidates was constitutional in some circumstances.
What argument did the University make in Regents v Bakke?
The court ruled in favor of Allan Bakke saying
that racial quotas violated equal protection under the law in the 14th amendment
. The court ordered that Bakke be admitted to The University of California.
How did Regents v Bakke change affirmative action policies?
How did Regents v. Bakke change affirmative action policies?
It struck down the use of strict racial quotas. It ruled race could not be factored into admissions.
Is affirmative action required?
A policy or practice of proactively hiring, promoting, or increasing in representation certain protected classes of people, such as women and minorities, who have suffered employment discrimination in the past. Three federal laws
require affirmative action
by federal contractors and subcontractors.
What was ruled in the case of Brown vs Board of Education Ethics quizlet?
The U.S. Supreme Court concluded in the Bakke decision that consideration of race in school admissions was unconstitutional. What was ruled in the case of Brown vs. Board of Education?
That “separate but equal” educational facilities were unconstitutional
.
What was the significance of the decision of the Supreme Court in Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978 )? Quizlet?
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, (1978) was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States. It
upheld affirmative action, allowing race to be one of several factors in college admission policy
.
What was the main outcome of the Supreme Court case of Griggs v Duke Power quizlet?
1971: Griggs v. Duke Power Co. the Supreme Court ruled that
Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act prohibits not only intentional job discrimination, but also employer practices that have a discriminatory effect on minorities and women
.
How did the decision in Regents of the University of California v Bakke affect individual rights?
Board of Education, and Regents of California v. … How did the decision in Regents v. Bakke affect individual rights?
It limited rights by giving all minorities higher priority.
Who won the Bakke case?
Bakke decision, formally Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, ruling in which, on June 28, 1978, the U.S. Supreme Court declared affirmative action constitutional but invalidated the use of racial quotas.
Who was responsible for initially questioning the effectiveness of affirmative action?
Allan Bakke
was responsible.
How did the Supreme Court rule in the case of Grutter v Bollinger quizlet?
Bollinger (2003), the Supreme Court ruled that
the use of affirmative action in school admission is constitutional if it treats race as one factor among many, its purpose is to achieve a “diverse” class, and it does not substitute for individualized review of applicant, but is unconstitutional if it automatically
…
Who hears evidence and offers a verdict?
The judge
makes a decision or the jury gives its verdict, based on the testimony and other evidence presented during trial. 8.
Why was it decided to lower the voting age to 18 from 21 quizlet?
Why was it decided to lower the voting age to 18 from 21? It was unusual that 18-year-olds could be drafted but could not vote.
to have a state law declared unconstitutional.
What was the important precedent set by the Gitlow v New York case?
What was the important precedent set by the Gitlow v. New York case?
The equal protection clause was dropped from the Fourteenth Amendment.
… Fourteenth Amendment rights were incorporated into the Fifteenth Amendment.
