Why did the US Supreme Court rule against the state of Tennessee in Baker v. Carr?
Tennessee had discriminated in favor of city voters over rural voters
.
What did the Supreme Court decide in Baker v Carr 1961?
Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that
redistricting qualifies as a justiciable question under the Fourteenth Amendment
, thus enabling federal courts to hear Fourteenth Amendment-based redistricting cases.
What did the Supreme Court rule in Baker v Carr quizlet?
The Supreme Court ruled in Baker v. Carr that
when apportionment of voting districts is disproportionate, the Equal Protect Clause is violated
. This became known as: one man-one vote rule.
What is the significance of Baker v Carr?
Carr (1962)
established the right of federal courts to review redistricting issues
, which had previously been termed “political questions” outside the courts' jurisdiction.
What amendment did Baker v Carr violate?
The case was brought by a group of Tennessee voters who alleged that the apportionment of Tennessee's state legislature failed to account for significant population variations between districts, violating
the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to United States Constitution
.
On what grounds did the Supreme Court claim it has a right to rule in the Baker case?
A lack of political question, previous court intervention in apportionment affairs and equal protection under the 14th amendment gave the court enough reason to
rule on legislative apportionment
.
How did the Baker v Carr case change the Supreme Court quizlet?
Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case that retreated from the Court's political question doctrine,
deciding that redistricting (attempts to change the way voting districts are delineated) issues present justiciable questions
, thus enabling federal courts to intervene in …
What was the issue in Baker v Carr quizlet?
Baker argued that
the existing apportionment denied voters of urban areas equal protection under the law as guaranteed by the 14th Amendment
. The federal court refused to hear the case under the “political question” doctrine, and the case was appealed to the Supreme Court.
What was the impact of the Baker Vs Carr case?
This case made
it possible for unrepresented voters to have their districts redrawn by federal courts
, initiating a decade of lawsuits that would eventually result in a redrawing of the nation's political map.
What best describes the holding in Baker v Carr?
Which of the following best describes the holding in Baker v. Carr (1961)?
Unequal representation of citizens in legislative districts is unconstitutional and may be reviewed by the courts
. You just studied 10 terms!
What was the majority opinion in Baker v Carr?
Justice Brennan wrote the majority opinion of the court, essentially
stating that dilution of votes was, in fact, denying the residents of Tennessee equal protection of the Fourteenth Amendment
. Justice Douglas wrote a concurring opinion, stating that voters should have a full constitutional value of their vote.
What important principle did the Supreme Court establish in the cases of Baker v Carr and Reynolds v Sims?
Sims, 377 U.S. 533 (1964), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court
ruled that the electoral districts of state legislative chambers must be roughly equal in population
. Along with Baker v. Carr (1962) and Wesberry v.
What is the difference between Colegrove v Green and Baker v Carr?
… apportionment cases; in 1946 in Colegrove v. Green the court said apportionment was a “political thicket” into which the judiciary should not intrude. In the Baker case, however,
the court held that each vote should carry equal weight regardless of the voter's
place of residence.
What is the best way for the judiciary to remain independent?
One way to promote judicial independence is
by granting life tenure or long tenure for judges
, which ideally frees them to decide cases and make rulings according to the rule of law and judicial discretion, even if those decisions are politically unpopular or opposed by powerful interests.
What were the facts of the case in Baker v Carr and Reynolds v Sims?
In Reynolds v. Sims (1964), using the Supreme Court's precedent set in Baker v. Carr (1962),
Warren held that representation in state legislatures must be apportioned equally on the basis of population rather than geographical areas
, remarking that “legislators represent people, not acres or trees.” In…
How did Supreme Court cases decided under the Warren Court impact public schools?
The Warren Court effectively
ended racial segregation in U.S. public schools
, expanded the constitutional rights of defendants, ensured equal representation in state legislatures, outlawed state-sponsored prayer in public schools, and paved the way for the legalization of abortion.
