Yes, the Monster Study has one independent variable that is
social labeling
.
What type of study was the monster study?
The Monster Study was
a stuttering experiment
performed on 22 orphan children in Davenport, Iowa in 1939. It was conducted by Wendell Johnson at the University of Iowa. Graduate student Mary Tudor conducted the experiment under Johnson’s supervision.
What was the control group in the monster study?
Group IIB
acted as the control, where normal-speaking subjects were complimented on their diction and speech for the entire duration of the experiment. The experiment was an eight-month experiment, running from January to August of 1939.
What was wrong with the monster study?
Nothing in the study indicated any of the subjects became stutterers. But researchers concluded that those in the negative therapy group showed a
loss of self-esteem
and other detrimental effects seen in adult stutterers.
Was the monster study unethical?
The Monster Experiment was an unethical experiment done in the year 1938. It was an
experiment to see whether stuttering could be taught
.
What is the aim of the Monster Study?
The main aim of the Monster Study was
to test the influence of social labeling on the development of stuttering
(e.g., your speech is good, your…
What kind of disorder is stuttering?
Stuttering — also called stammering or childhood-onset fluency disorder — is
a speech disorder
that involves frequent and significant problems with normal fluency and flow of speech. People who stutter know what they want to say, but have difficulty saying it.
Why was the monster study not published?
The so-called ‘Monster Study’ on children’s stuttering was dramatic,
had shaky ethics
and was never published. … First, it had extremely shaky (practically non-existent) ethical standards. Second, its results were never published for fear it would be likened to experiments carried out by the Nazis (Rothwell, 2003).
What is the Diagnosogenic theory?
The diagnosogenic (semantogenic) theory for the onset of stuttering was initially proposed by Wendell Johnson in the early 1940s. It
suggested that calling attention to a child’s normal hesitations (repetitions) could precipitate stuttering
(Bloodstein, 1987).
What was unethical about the Milgram experiment?
The experiment was deemed unethical,
because the participants were led to believe that they were administering shocks to real people
. The participants were unaware that the learner was an associate of Milgram’s. However, Milgram argued that deception was necessary to produce the desired outcomes of the experiment.
What was the Monkey Drug Trials 1969?
Monkey Drug Trials 1969
The monkey drug trials of 1969 were one such case. In this experiment, a
large group of monkeys and rats were trained to inject themselves with an assortment of drugs
, including morphine, alcohol, codeine, cocaine, and amphetamines.
What is the Tudor study?
Recent exposure of an experiment (the Tudor Study) conducted in 1939 at the University of Iowa with the aim of
studying the effect of verbal labeling on the frequency of disfluency in children who stutter
and in normally fluent children has raised strong reactions both from the general public and the scientific …
Does stuttering get worse with age?
In many cases,
stuttering goes away on its own by age 5
. In some kids, it goes on for longer. Effective treatments are available to help a child overcome it.
Why did I develop a stutter?
A sudden stutter can be caused by a number of things:
brain trauma, epilepsy
, drug abuse (particularly heroin), chronic depression or even attempted suicide using barbiturates, according to the National Institutes of Health.
What is the best treatment for stuttering?
Research suggests that
speech therapy
is the best treatment for both adults and children who stutter, with a large body of evidence supporting its efficacy. CBT is a type of psychotherapy that helps people change how they think and alter their behavior accordingly. CBT for stuttering may involve: direct communication.
What is the covert repair hypothesis?
Basically, the covert repair hypothesis
contends that disfluencies reflect the interfering side-effects of covert, prearticulatory repairing of speech programming errors on the ongoing speech
. … This reasoning is argued to apply to both normal and stuttered disfluency.
