How Did The Federalist Argue Their Support For Ratification Of The Constitution?

The Federalists countered that

a strong government was necessary to lead the new nation and promised to add a bill of rights to the Constitution

. The Federalist Papers, in particular, argued in favor of ratification and sought to convince people that the new government would not become tyrannical.

What arguments did federalists make to support the ratification of the Constitution?

The Federalists

wanted a strong government and strong executive branch

, while the anti-Federalists wanted a weaker central government. The Federalists did not want a bill of rights —they thought the new constitution was sufficient. The anti-federalists demanded a bill of rights.

What were the 3 main arguments of the Federalists against the Constitution?

The

Federalists wanted a strong government and strong executive branch

, while the anti-Federalists wanted a weaker central government. The Federalists did not want a bill of rights —they thought the new constitution was sufficient. The anti-federalists demanded a bill of rights.

What did the Federalists agree to in order to get enough support for the ratification of the Constitution?

To ensure ratification by all states, supporters of the Constitution (Federalists) agreed to

add a group of amendments that would serve as the Bill of Rights

. Many against the Constitution ( Anti-Federalists ) refused to ratify unless such individual rights were protected.

Did the Federalists support the Constitution?

Led by Alexander Hamilton, albeit secretly at first, the Federalists were the first political party of the United States.

They supported the Constitution

, and attempted to convince the States to ratify the document.

Did the Federalists want a bill of rights?

Federalists argued that

the Constitution did not need a bill of rights

, because the people and the states kept any powers not given to the federal government. Anti-Federalists held that a bill of rights was necessary to safeguard individual liberty.

Why did James Madison oppose the inclusion of a list of individual rights in the Constitution?

They opposed the ratification of the Constitution

because it gave more power to the federal government and less to the states

, and because it did not ensure individual rights. Many wanted to keep the Articles of Confederation.

What was added to the Constitution to help gain the support of Anti-Federalists?

strongly influenced the shape of the Constitution. … Which of the following was added to the Constitution to help gain the support of anti-Federalists?

the Bill of Rights

. Which of the following was a weakness of the Articles of Confederation?

Who was the most famous anti federalist?

• Patrick Henry, Virginia.
• Samuel Adams, Massachusetts.
• Joshua Atherton, New Hampshire.
• George Mason, Virginia.
• Richard Henry Lee, Virginia.
• Robert Yates, New York.
• James Monroe, Virginia.
• Amos Singletary, Massachusetts.

What did the Federalists believe in?

Federalists wanted

a strong central government

. They believed that a strong central government was necessary if the states were going to band together to form a nation. A strong central government could represent the nation to other countries.

What is the difference between federalist and anti federalist?

Those who supported the Constitution and a stronger national republic were

known as Federalists. Those who opposed the ratification of the Constitution in favor of small localized government were known as Anti-Federalists. … They did not share one unified position on the proper form of government.

Who did the Federalists represent?

Federalist Party

Why did Hamilton not want a bill of rights?

Hamilton didn't support the addition of a Bill of Rights because he

believed that the Constitution wasn't written to limit the people

. It listed the powers of the government and left all that remained to the states and the people.

Why did James Madison not want a bill of rights?

Among his several reasons for opposing a bill of rights was that such documents were

often just “parchment barriers” that overbearing majorities violated in the states regardless

of whether the written protections for minority rights existed. As he wrote in Federalist Paper No.

What would happen if we didn't have a Bill of Rights?

Without the Bill of Rights,

the entire Constitution would fall apart

. Since the Constitution is the framework of our government, then we as a nation would eventually stray from the original image the founding fathers had for us. The Bill of Rights protects the rights of all the citizens of the United States.

Which complaint was the greatest barrier to ratifying the Constitution?