However, mistreatment of prisoners escalated so alarmingly that principal investigator Philip G. Zimbardo terminated the experiment after only six days. …
Prisoners were “arrested” by actual police and handed over to the experimenters
in a mock prison in the basement of a campus building.
Why did Philip Zimbardo discontinue his classic experiment?
An End to the Experiment
Zimbardo (1973) had intended that the experiment should run for two weeks, but on the sixth day it was terminated,
due to the emotional breakdowns of prisoners, and excessive aggression of the guards
. Christina Maslach, a recent Stanford Ph.
Why did Philip Zimbardo discontinue his classic experiment that involved students playing the roles of prisoners and guards?
Zimbardo intended the experiment to run for two weeks. But it was abandoned after just six days
because of the prisoners’ pathological reactions
.
What error did Zimbardo make in his research?
One mistake was
his taking on the role of prison superintendent
. Instead of simply observing from a neutral location or reviewing the data later, Zimbardo made himself an authority figure, which meant he was part of the experiment.
What is the point of Zimbardo’s prisoners experiment?
Q: What was the purpose of the Stanford Prison Experiment? A: The
purpose was to understand the development of norms and the effects of roles, labels, and social expectations in a simulated prison environment.
Who was Prisoner 8612?
One of the prisoners (#8612),
Douglas Korpi
, a 22-year-old Berkeley graduate, began to exhibit uncontrollable crying and rage 36 hours into the experiment, described by Zimbardo as “acute emotional disturbance”.
Could Stanford prisoners leave?
“
You can’t leave. You can’t quit!
” were the first words he told the other prisoners as soon as he arrived at the cells. This heightened the prisoners’ fear and tension for being really imprisoned.
How did the good guards react to what the bad guards were doing?
How did the good guards react to what the bad guards were doing?
The good guards refused to acknowledge the actions of the bad guards
and hence took on roles such as being the gofer so they did not have to witness the manifestation of excruciating atrocities on the fellow participants.
What is a major problem with the original Milgram study?
What is a major problem with the original Milgram study?
Milgram lied to his respondents, making his study borderline unethical
. What is the major flaw in the Asch conformity study? Asch ignored the importance of several factors influencing conformity- race, class, and gender.
What did he tell the guards they couldn’t do to the prisoners?
He told the other prisoners
that ‘you can’t leave. you can’t quit
‘, which made the other prisoners feel like they were actual prisoners and couldn’t escape. #8612 then began to act ‘crazy’, and was then released from the experiment.
What did the guards do to punish the rebellion?
The guards broke into each cell, stripped the prisoners naked, took the beds out,
forced the ringleaders of the prisoner rebellion into solitary confinement
, and generally began to harass and intimidate the prisoners.
What prevented good guards from objecting to the orders from the tough of bad guards?
What prevented “good guards” from objecting or countermanding the orders from tough or bad guards? The
good guards were unable to object or
countermand the bad guards because of the fear of what it would do to the guards’ authoritative role in the eyes of the prisoners.
What was the most serious charge leveled against the Milgram experiment?
One of the more serious charges leveled against Milgram’s paper was the
original sin of social science research: sample bias
.
Is the Milgram experiment accurate?
In the 1960s, Stanley Milgram’s electric-shock studies showed that people will obey even the most abhorrent of orders. In the most well-known variation of the experiment,
a full 65 percent of people went all the way
. …
What happened in the Milgram experiment?
Milgram selected participants for his experiment by
newspaper advertising for male participants to take part in a study of learning at Yale University
. The procedure was that the participant was paired with another person and they drew lots to find out who would be the ‘learner’ and who would be the ‘teacher.
How quickly did the guards begin to abuse the prisoners?
Day 3: guards strike back
The three spent time in the “good” cell where they received clothing, beds, and food denied to the rest of the jail population. After an
estimated 12 hours
, the three returned to their old cells that lacked beds. Guards abused their power to humiliate the inmates.