Federalists
wanted a strong central government. They believed that a strong central government was necessary if the states were going to band together to form a nation. A strong central government could represent the nation to other countries.
Who felt that a strong central government was needed?
Federalists
wanted a strong central government. They believed that a strong central government was necessary if the states were going to band together to form a nation. A strong central government could represent the nation to other countries.
How did anti-federalists feel about a strong central government?
How did Anti-federalists feels about a strong central government?
They opposed it.
… No single branch of government would have too much power. You just studied 15 terms!
How did Alexander Hamilton and James Madison view the Constitution?
How did Alexander Hamilton and James Madison view the Constitution?
They led those who favored the Constitution
. … He was an Anti-Federalist and opposed the Constitution.
Who was right Federalists or anti-federalists?
Those who supported the Constitution and a stronger national republic were known as
Federalists
. Those who opposed the ratification of the Constitution in favor of small localized government were known as Anti-Federalists.
Who supported a weaker central government?
Many Anti-Federalists
preferred a weak central government because they equated a strong government with British tyranny. Others wanted to encourage democracy and feared a strong government that would be dominated by the wealthy. They felt that the states were giving up too much power to the new federal government.
Why did the Articles of Confederation create a weak central government?
Why did the writers of the Articles of Confederation purposely create a weak central government?
They wanted to protect the citizens rights, they did not want the government to have too much power
. Group that wanted a stronger national government.
Why did the Anti-Federalists oppose the new Constitution?
The Anti-Federalists opposed the ratification of the 1787 U.S. Constitution
because they feared that the new national government would be too powerful and thus threaten individual liberties
, given the absence of a bill of rights.
What would a bill of rights accomplish quizlet?
What would a bill of rights accomplish?
It would limit government powers
.
Why did federalists argue against term limits quizlet?
They thought it was unnecessary because the Constitution would already limit government powers. Why did Federalists argue for a separation of powers?
No single branch of government would have too much power
. … It would limit government powers.
Why did Hamilton want a strong national government?
Hamilton wanted a strong central government
because he was afraid that the state governments would be
(as they had been under the Articles of Confederation) too democratic. … He worried that they would force the governments to pass laws like the stay laws that would harm the country's economy.
Who wrote Constitution?
Many of the United States Founding Fathers were at the
Constitutional
Convention, where the
Constitution
was hammered out and ratified. George Washington, for example, presided over the Convention. James Madison, also present,
wrote
the document that formed the model for the
Constitution
.
What happened between Hamilton and Madison?
The Compromise of 1790 was a compromise between Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson with James Madison, where Hamilton won the decision for the national government to take over and pay the state debts, and Jefferson and Madison obtained the national capital (District of Columbia) for the South.
What were three differences between the Federalists and the anti-Federalists?
The Federalists wanted a strong government and strong executive branch
, while the anti-Federalists wanted a weaker central government. The Federalists did not want a bill of rights —they thought the new constitution was sufficient. The anti-federalists demanded a bill of rights.
Why didn't the federalists want a bill of rights?
Federalists argued that the Constitution did not need a bill of rights, because
the people and the states kept any powers not given to the federal government
. Anti-Federalists held that a bill of rights was necessary to safeguard individual liberty.
What is the opposite of federalism?
This time, it was decided that a government system based on federalism would be established. … The opposite of this system of government is a centralized government, such as in France and Great Britain, where the national government holds all power.
