The Little Albert Experiment demonstrated that
classical conditioning
—the association of a particular stimulus or behavior with an unrelated stimulus or behavior—works in human beings. In this experiment, a previously unafraid baby was conditioned to become afraid of a rat.
What are the ethical issues with the Little Albert Experiment?
according to today’s ethical standards,
the nature of the study itself would be considered unethical
, as it did not protect Albert from psychological harm, because its purpose was to induce a state of fear. Many sources claim that Little Albert was used as a subject in the study without the permission of his mother.
Was the Little Albert Experiment replicated?
The study had only one subject.
The study has never been replicated
.
What was the conclusion of the Little Albert Experiment?
In conclusion, Watson and Rayner concluded that their hypothesis was correct, and
they could condition “little Albert” to fear something irrational
. Although their experiment was riddled with third variables such as age and mental ability.
What was the aim of the Little Albert Experiment?
The aim of Watson and Rayner was to
condition a phobia in an emotionally stable child
. For this study they chose a nine-month old infant from a hospital referred to as “Albert” for the experiment. Watson followed the procedures which Pavlov had used in his experiments with dogs.
What Happened to Baby Albert after testing?
Tragically, medical records showed that Douglas
had severe neurological problems and died at an early age of hydrocephalus, or water on the brain
. According to his records, this seems to have resulted in vision problems, so much so that at times he was considered blind.
What was the main point of Ivan Pavlov’s experiment with dogs?
Pavlov (1902) started from the idea
that there are some things that a dog does not need to learn
. For example, dogs don’t learn to salivate whenever they see food. This reflex is ‘hard-wired’ into the dog. In behaviorist terms, food is an unconditioned stimulus and salivation is an unconditioned response.
What was the white rat in the Little Albert Experiment?
In the Little Albert Experiment the white rat was
the conditioned stimulus
. Behavior which is similar (but not necessarily the same) to the UCR, which is triggered by the CS after classical conditioning. Conditioned responses are learned. E.g. fear when presentation with the white rat.
Was the Little Albert experiment confidentiality?
Confidentiality
.
Written form of all aspects of the experiment
. Must be signed by subject. Albert’s mother Arvilla Merritte would have needed to give consent.
Why was the Milgram experiment unethical?
The experiment was deemed unethical, because
the participants were led to believe that they were administering shocks to real people
. The participants were unaware that the learner was an associate of Milgram’s. However, Milgram argued that deception was necessary to produce the desired outcomes of the experiment.
What was the major criticism of the Little Albert experiment?
The experiment was not carefully designed or conducted, Little Albert’s Fears were not Objectively Measured, but were Subjectively Observed. The experiment was unethical because Watson and Raynor, did not extinguish Little Albert’s
Fear Response to furry animals and objects
.
Who did the Little Albert experiment?
The Little Albert experiment was a famous psychology experiment conducted by
behaviorist John B. Watson and graduate student Rosalie Rayner
. 1 Previously, Russian physiologist Ivan Pavlov had conducted experiments demonstrating the conditioning process in dogs.
What happened after Little Albert was classically conditioned to fear a tame white rat?
What happened after “Little Albert” was classically conditioned to fear a tame white rat? …
Stimulus generalization occurred; Albert responded with fear to other furry animals and fuzzy objects
.
How did the Little Albert experiment contribute to the field of behavioral psychology?
The Little Albert experiment is a
demonstration of a classic conditioning such as the naturally occurring stimuli
, which are what behaviorists study. Psychological researchers B.F. Skinner, Ivan Pavlov, and John B. … Watson’s work contributed to psychology through the development of methodological behaviorism.
Who is the real Little Albert?
“Little Albert,” the baby behind John Watson’s famous 1920 emotional conditioning experiment at Johns Hopkins University, has been identified as
Douglas Merritte
, the son of a wetnurse named Arvilla Merritte who lived and worked at a campus hospital at the time of the experiment — receiving $1 for her baby’s …
Who was responsible for the classical conditioning of Little Albert quizlet?
Terms in this set (14) *The “Little Albert” experiment was a famous psychology experiment conducted by
behaviorist John B. Watson and graduate student Rosalie
Rayner. *The participant in the experiment was a child that Watson and Rayner called “Albert B.”, but is known popularly today as Little Albert.
