Can you have high reliability and low validity?
It is possible to have a measure that has high reliability but low validity
– one that is consistent in getting bad information or consistent in missing the mark. *It is also possible to have one that has low reliability and low validity – inconsistent and not on target.
Can you have high reliability and high validity?
Reliability and validity are closely related, but they mean different things. A measurement can be reliable without being valid. However,
if a measurement is valid, it is usually also reliable
.
Can a test have high reliability and low validity or vice versa?
–
Reliability is a prerequisite for validity, but not vice-versa
. -Validity is determined by assessing the relationship between test results, characteristics, performances, and/or certain behaviors.
Can you have validity and not reliability?
Although a test can be reliable without being valid, it cannot be valid without being reliable
. If a test is inconsistent in its measurements, we cannot say it is measuring what it is intended to measure and, therefore, it is considered invalid.
Does reliability limit validity?
While reliability does not imply validity,
reliability does place a limit on the overall validity of a test
. A test that is not perfectly reliable cannot be perfectly valid, either as a means of measuring attributes of a person or as a means of predicting scores on a criterion.
How validity and reliability complement each other?
Validity implies the extent to which the research instrument measures, what it is intended to measure. Reliability refers to the degree to which scale produces consistent results, when repeated measurements are made. A valid instrument is always reliable. A reliable instrument need not be a valid instrument.
What is poor validity and poor reliability?
Validity is the degree to which the researcher actually measures what he or she is trying to measure. Reliability and validity are often compared to a marksman’s target. In the illustration below, Target B represents measurement with poor validity and poor reliability.
The shots are neither consistent nor accurate
.
What is the relationship between validity and reliability of test?
A test can be reliable without being valid. However, a test cannot be valid unless it is reliable
. Another way to think of it is that a test can give a consistent, poor result. However, it cannot give a good result unless it is consistent.
Reliability and validity are both about how well a method measures something: Reliability refers to the consistency of a measure (whether the results can be reproduced under the same conditions). Validity refers to the accuracy of a measure (whether the results really do represent what they are supposed to measure).
Is reliable test always valid?
However,
tests that are reliable aren’t always valid
.
For example, let’s say your thermometer was a degree off. It would be reliable (giving you the same results each time) but not valid (because the thermometer wasn’t recording the correct temperature).
Are both reliability and validity necessary for a good measure?
Reliability is necessary for validity, but not sufficient
(more information is needed). You CAN have good reliability WITHOUT validity. You can attain consistent scores, but the test might not be measuring what you think you’re measuring.
Is validity more important than reliability?
Validity is more difficult to evaluate than reliability
. After all, with reliability, you only assess whether the measures are consistent across time, within the instrument, and between observers. On the other hand, evaluating validity involves determining whether the instrument measures the correct characteristic.
How can a test be reliable but not valid example?
For a test to be reliable, it also needs to be valid. For example, if your scale is off by 5 lbs, it reads your weight every day with an excess of 5lbs. The scale is reliable because it consistently reports the same weight every day, but it is not valid
because it adds 5lbs to your true weight
.
Why reliability is not sufficient condition for validity?
If test scores are not reliable, they cannot be valid since
they will not provide a good estimate of the ability or trait that the test intends to measure
. Reliability is therefore a necessary but not sufficient condition for validity. Reliability refers to the accuracy or repeatability of the test scores.
How can be validity and reliability be improved?
You can increase the validity of an experiment by
controlling more variables, improving measurement technique, increasing randomization to reduce sample bias, blinding the experiment, and adding control or placebo groups
.
How important is reliability and validity in research?
The purpose of establishing reliability and validity in research is essentially to ensure that data are sound and replicable, and the results are accurate. The evidence of validity and reliability are
prerequisites to assure the integrity and quality of a measurement instrument
[Kimberlin & Winterstein, 2008].
Are reliability and validity mutually exclusive?
Reliability and validity are mutually exclusive
: a test can be reliable or valid, but it can’t be both. B. If a test is reliable, then it is valid, but if a test is not reliable, it cannot be valid.
When discussing the relationship between reliability and validity Which of the following is true?
When discussing the relationship between reliability and validity, which of the following is true?
Low reliability always indicates low degree of validity
.
Can a study have high reliability without high validity?
A measure can be reliable but not valid
. For example, if our survey about stereotyped thinking had a high reliability, it would consistently give the same answer. But, if it wasn’t measuring stereotyped thinking but instead measuring something else (say, IQ), it would have a low validity.
What causes low validity?
When the test items have an inappropriate level of difficulty
, it will affect the validity of the tool. For example, in criterion-referenced tests, failure to match the difficulty specified by the learning outcome will lower the validity.
What is the relationship between validity and reliability can a test be reliable and yet not valid illustrate?
Test results do not have to be valid to be reliable. However, a test cannot be valid if it is not reliable. Tests can also be both unreliable and invalid. The difference between reliability and validity is that
validity measures accuracy while reliability measures the consistency of test results
.
What is the relationship between reliability and validity quizlet?
What is the difference between reliability & validity?
Reliability: The test measures one and only one thing (precisely). Validity: The test measures what it is supposed to measure.
What is the difference between validity and reliability?
Validity implies the extent to which the research instrument measures, what it is intended to measure. Reliability refers to the degree to which assessment tool produces consistent results, when repeated measurements are made.
What is the difference between the reliability and validity of an assessment?
The reliability of an assessment tool is the extent to which it consistently and accurately measures learning. The validity of an assessment tool is the extent by which it measures what it was designed to measure.
What is low face validity?
Good face validity means that anyone who reviews your measure says that it seems to be measuring what it’s supposed to. With poor face validity,
someone reviewing your measure may be left confused about what you’re measuring and why you’re using this method
.
What is the minimum accepted value below which reliability Cannot be accepted?
A general accepted rule is that α of 0.6-0.7 indicates an acceptable level of reliability, and 0.8 or greater a very good level. However, values
higher than 0.95
are not necessarily good, since they might be an indication of redundance (Hulin, Netemeyer, and Cudeck, 2001).
How can a test be reliable and yet invalid quizlet?
How can a test be reliable and yet invalid?
If a test has improper means to measure or predict what it’s supposed to, it’s invalid
. Yet, if the results of this test are consistent, then the test is reliable.
Can a study have high validity without high reliability?
A measure can be reliable but not valid
. For example, if our survey about stereotyped thinking had a high reliability, it would consistently give the same answer. But, if it wasn’t measuring stereotyped thinking but instead measuring something else (say, IQ), it would have a low validity.
When discussing the relationship between reliability and validity Which of the following is true?
What does validity and reliability mean?
Reliability and validity are both about
how well a method measures something
: Reliability refers to the consistency of a measure (whether the results can be reproduced under the same conditions). Validity refers to the accuracy of a measure (whether the results really do represent what they are supposed to measure).
Has high validity qualitative or quantitative?
Collis Hussey, 2003 claim that
qualitative has low reliability and high validity
, whereas quantitative data has high reliability and low validity.
