Could the Stanford prison experiment be conducted today? The Stanford Prison Experiment is frequently cited as an example of unethical research.
The experiment could not be replicated by researchers today
because it fails to meet the standards established by numerous ethical codes, including the Ethics Code of the American Psychological Association.
Is the Stanford Prison Experiment relevant today?
Though ethical concerns and controversy still swirl around the Stanford prison experiment,
its relevance today is undeniable
. And as many Americans perceive the nation lurching towards authoritarianism, its conclusions are more vital to understand than ever.
Can the Stanford prison experiment be replicated?
As mentioned in the question, recent evidence suggests what many psychologists believed for quite a while, that perhaps its conclusions were less valid than claimed by researchers. To the best of my knowledge,
no researchers have ever been able to replicate the results of the experiment
.
What does the Stanford prison experiment teach us today?
What was ethically wrong with the Stanford Prison Experiment?
Ethical Issues
The study has received many ethical criticisms, including
lack of fully informed consent by participants
as Zimbardo himself did not know what would happen in the experiment (it was unpredictable). Also, the prisoners did not consent to being ‘arrested’ at home.
How was the Stanford Prison Experiment applied to everyday life?
This experiment can be applied to other situations in which
social norms, roles, and scripts dictate our behavior, such as in mob behavior
. A more recent example of similar behavior was the abuse of prisoners by American soldiers who were working as prison guards at the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq.
Why is Zimbardo’s experiment influential today?
While Zimbardo’s best-known experiment took place decades ago, its impact is still felt on psychology today.
The images of torture and prisoner abuse that emerged from the Iraq prison known as Abu Ghraib echoed the notorious events in Zimbardo’s infamous experiment.
What error did Zimbardo make in his research?
One mistake was
his taking on the role of prison superintendent
. Instead of simply observing from a neutral location or reviewing the data later, Zimbardo made himself an authority figure, which meant he was part of the experiment.
How accurate is the Stanford Prison Experiment movie?
There were no scenes that had to be put in for the drama. If anything, they left out a lot of what I consider powerful scenes, which they actually had in and it just went too long so they had to cut it out. I’d say it’s
roughly 90 percent accurate
.
Who was prisoner 819?
#819.
The only prisoner who did not want to speak to the priest
was Prisoner #819, who was feeling sick, had refused to eat, and wanted to see a doctor rather than a priest. Eventually he was persuaded to come out of his cell and talk to the priest and superintendent so we could see what kind of a doctor he needed.
Was it ethical to do this study was it right to trade the suffering experienced by participants for the knowledge gained by the research?
Was it right to trade the suffering experienced by participants for the knowledge gained by the research? Though the researchers could not have anticipated the disastrous potential of their experiment,
it was not ethical
to conduct this study.
Was Zimbardo’s hypothesis correct?
STANFORD PRISON EXPERIMENT
Zimbardo’s hypothesis proved to be correct
, but the results came in much faster than he expected. Within 36 hours the first prisoner, someone Zimbardo selected for being “normal” and healthy, had an emotional breakdown.
Is the experiment based on real life?
To a certain extent, yes. The movie, and the book that inspired it, is
loosely based on the real-life Stanford prison experiment conducted in 1971
. A group of test subjects was divided in two subsets, one assuming the role of prisoners and the other assuming the role of prison guards.
Is the Stanford experiment based on a true story?
The movie, starring Ezra Miller and Michael Angarano and due in theaters on July 17, is
based on the true story of a trial conducted by Dr. Philip Zimbardo (played by Billy Crudup in the movie) at Stanford University in 1971
.
Was the Stanford experiment ethical?
As for the ethics of the experiment,
Zimbardo said he believed the experiment was ethical before it began but unethical in hindsight
because he and the others involved had no idea the experiment would escalate to the point of abuse that it did.
Did Zimbardo debrief his participants?
Despite the ethical issues,
Zimbardo did debrief his participants
in an attempt to overcome the deception of the aim of the experiment and any harm caused. A second limitation of Zimbardo’s research is that there was a lack of supporting evidence.
What do you think prevented good guards from objecting to the orders from the bad guards?
What prevented “good guards” from objecting or countermanding the orders from tough or bad guards? The good guards were unable to object or countermand the bad guards because of the
fear of what it would do to the guards’ authoritative role in the eyes of the prisoners
.
How long did it take for the first prisoner to be released from the experiment Why was he released?
The First Prisoner Released
Less than 36 hours
into the experiment, Prisoner #8612 began suffering from acute emotional disturbance, disorganized thinking, uncontrollable crying, and rage.
Was Milgram’s experiment replicated?
Was the Stanford Prison Experiment approved by the IRB?
Q: Was the Stanford Prison Experiment approved by an Institutional Review Board? A:
Yes, the study was approved by the Stanford Human Subjects Review Committee, the Stanford Psychology Department, and the Group Effectiveness Branch of the Office of Naval Research
.
What was the BBC Prison Study?
The BBC Prison Study
explores the social and psychological consequences of putting people in groups of unequal power
. It examines when people accept inequality and when they challenge it. Findings from the study were first broadcast by the BBC in 2002.
