Did The Atomic Bomb Save More Lives Than It Took?

Did the atomic bomb save more lives than it took? Lewis estimates that the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, to the extent that it induced Japanese surrender,

saved the lives of roughly 30 million people

.

Did the atomic bomb result in saving of more lives?

Lewis estimates that the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, to the extent that it induced Japanese surrender,

saved the lives of roughly 30 million people

.

How many American lives did the atomic bomb save?

That it saved

1 million

American lives (or some variation on this number) by avoiding an Allied invasion of Japan. Or that we had to drop the bombs because Japan was never going to surrender.

How long would World War 2 have lasted without the atomic bomb?

Was the atomic bomb worth it?

“Yes.

A bloody invasion and round-the-clock conventional bombing would have led to a far higher death toll and so the atomic weapons actually saved thousands of American and millions of Japanese lives.

The bombs were the best means to bring about unconditional surrender

, which is what the US leaders wanted.

What were the benefits of dropping the atomic bomb?

The most common advantage usually cited for dropping the atomic bombs is that

the action would spare more lives than it cost

. There had been recent battles at Okinawa and Iwo Jima that had already cost the American military forces thousands of lives.

Did the dropping of the atomic bomb shorten the war?

“

The atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki ended World War II

. There can be no doubt of that. While they brought death and destruction on a horrifying scale, they averted even greater losses – American, English, and Japanese”.

How did the atomic bomb help America?

The fact of the bomb was useful in

ensuring that Western Europe would rely on the United States to guarantee its security rather than seeking an outside accommodation with the Soviet Union

, because even if the United States did not station large numbers of troops on the continent, it could protect the region by placing …

Which bomb was worse Hiroshima or Nagasaki?

The plutonium-type bomb detonated over Nagasaki actually had a greater explosive power than that used on Hiroshima

. The reason for the greater number of casualties in the latter city is to be sought in large part in differences in the physical features of the two cities.

How many lives were lost in the bombing of Hiroshima?

However, it’s estimated roughly

70,000 to 135,000

people died in Hiroshima and 60,000 to 80,000 people died in Nagasaki, both from acute exposure to the blasts and from long-term side effects of radiation.

Is Hiroshima still radioactive today?

Is there still radiation in Hiroshima and Nagasaki?

The radiation in Hiroshima and Nagasaki today is on a par with the extremely low levels of background radiation (natural radioactivity) present anywhere on Earth

. It has no effect on human bodies.

Did Japan sue for peace before the bomb?

No. The Japanese were not “suing for peace” prior to the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Did the US warn Japan about atomic bomb?

Leaflets dropped on cities in Japan warning civilians about the atomic bomb

, dropped c. August 6, 1945. TO THE JAPANESE PEOPLE: America asks that you take immediate heed of what we say on this leaflet.

How did Japan feel after the atomic bomb?

Further,

28 percent of the people of Japan as a whole said they had never reached a point where they felt they could not go on with the war

, whereas 39 percent of the people in the Hiroshima-Nagasaki areas said they had never reached such a point.

What if Japan didn’t surrender?

If Japan Didn’t Surrender,

America Would Have Leveled It With Battleships

. While the attacks definitely made an impression, they did not offer the Navy a long-term strategic role for its battlefleet. Key Point: The U.S. Navy dealt with its surplus of battleships by launching raids along the coast of Japan.

Would Japan surrendered without the atomic bomb?

However, the overwhelming historical evidence from American and Japanese archives indicates that

Japan would have surrendered that August, even if atomic bombs had not been used

— and documents prove that President Truman and his closest advisors knew it.

How did the atomic bomb help the world?

It

thrust the world into the atomic age, changing warfare and geopolitical relations forever

. Less than a month later, the U.S. dropped two nuclear weapons on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan—further proving it was now possible to obliterate large swaths of land and kill masses of people in seconds.

What were the pros and cons of the atomic bomb?

• PROS. …
• Pro #1: The bombs ended WWII. …
• Con #4: The US could have used a better plan. …
• Pro #3: The bombs saved money. …
• Con #3: The bombs were deployed too early. …
• Pro #4: The bombs made the US a superpower. …
• Con #2: The bombs caused a nuclear fallout. …
• Pro #5: The bombs saved people.

Was the bombing of Japan justified?

Why did President Truman feel he had no choice but to drop the atomic bombs?

Truman stated that his decision to drop the bomb was

purely military

. A Normandy-type amphibious landing would have cost an estimated million casualties. Truman believed that the bombs saved Japanese lives as well. Prolonging the war was not an option for the President.

Did Hiroshima get rebuilt?

Hiroshima was rebuilt after the war

, with help from the national government through the Hiroshima Peace Memorial City Construction Law passed in 1949. It provided financial assistance for reconstruction, along with land donated that was previously owned by the national government and used by the Imperial military.

Why America shouldn’t have dropped the atomic bomb?

The United States would have looked weak and foolish

. A failed demonstration might even serve to increase Japanese resolve. Additionally, the U.S. only had two bombs left after Los Alamos. If the demonstration failed to convince the Japanese to surrender, only one bomb would remain.

How did Americans feel after Hiroshima?

After the atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945, the mood in America was

a complex blend of pride, relief, and fear

. Americans were jubilant that the war was over, and proud that the technology created to win the war had been developed in their country.

What outweighs the fact that dropping the bomb would save American lives?

The military advantages and the saving of American lives achieved by the sudden use of atomic bombs against Japan may be outweighed by the

ensuing loss of confidence and by a wave of horror and repulsion sweeping over the rest of the world and perhaps even dividing public opinion at home

.

What cities would be nuked first?

The cities that would most likely be attacked are

Washington, New York City and Los Angeles

. Using a van or SUV, the device could easily be delivered to the heart of a city and detonated. The effects and response planning from a nuclear blast are determined using statics from Washington, the most likely target.

Was Fat Man or Little Boy more powerful?

The Fat Man produced an explosion of about 21 kilotons. The B83? 1.2 megatons, equaling 1,200,000 tons of TNT, making it

80 times more powerful than the Little Boy

.

How did Einstein react to the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki?

He was

deeply shaken by the extent of the destruction and wrote a public missive to the United Nations

. He proposed the formation of a world government to stop the use of nuclear weapons.

How long was Hiroshima uninhabitable?

It was being said, he reported, that Hiroshima might remain uninhabitable for

75 years

. Yet within 24 hours, survivors were already returning to the city to search for relatives, friends, and former homes in the rubble.

How long did it take for Japan to surrender after the atomic bombs?

How many Japanese were killed by atomic bombs?

Why Hiroshima was chosen?

Hiroshima was chosen

as the primary target since it had remained largely untouched by bombing raids

, and the bomb’s effects could be clearly measured.

Can you survive a nuclear bomb in a fridge?

What is the most radioactive place on earth?

Fukushima

is the most radioactive place on Earth. A tsunami led to reactors melting at the Fukushima nuclear power plant. Even though it’s been nine years, it doesn’t mean the disaster is behind us.

How was Hiroshima cleaned?

First,

the rubble was cleared from the major streets

, allowing trucks and heavy equipment better access to the site. Here we can see the progress, as by March of 1946, the main roads have been cleared of debris, and many of the ruined buildings have been demolished and cleared away.

What do the Japanese think of Hiroshima?

As for the atomic bombings themselves, first and foremost Japanese society holds Hiroshima and Nagasaki up as

the epitome of the suffering and destruction that war brings

.

Was Japan actually going to surrender?

The general interpretation of the intercepts at the time was that Japan might be on the road to surrender, and they perceived there was a sympathetic “peace party” in their high command, but that

Japan was ultimately not yet ready to accept unconditional surrender

.