Do The Ends Ever Justify The Means?

by | Last updated on January 24, 2024

, , , ,

—used to say

that a desired result is so good or important

that any method, even a morally bad one, may be used to achieve it They believe that the end justifies the means and will do anything to get their candidate elected.

Why doesn’t the end justify the means?

Schroeder: Why the end doesn’t justify the means, but the means can always justify the end. … But as young kids, we learned that the “end doesn’t justify the means.” In other words,

a positive outcome isn’t, well

, a good thing if the methods used were dishonest or harmful to others.

Does the ends justify the means?

—used to say that

a desired result is so good or important that any method

, even a morally bad one, may be used to achieve it They believe that the end justifies the means and will do anything to get their candidate elected.

Do the ends justify the means yes or no?

So, in short, yes, the ends do justify the means

if the moral gains of the ends are greater than the moral losses by the means

. MATTAN GRIFFEL This is the core of the distinction between two main ethical positions: deontology

Who said ends justify the means?

The end justifies the means is a phrase of Sergey Nechayev, the 19th century Russian revolutionary. It means that if a goal is morally important enough, any method of getting it is acceptable.

Does the end justify the means philosophy?

The phrase “the end justifies the means” is

used to suggest that any activity, whether or not that activity could be considered ethically or morally bad, is worth doing so long as a desired end result is achieved

. The origins of the phrase go back to consequentialism.

What does Machiavellian mean today?

Someone Machiavellian is

sneaky, cunning, and lacking a moral code

. The word comes from the Italian philosopher Niccolò Machiavelli, who wrote the political treatise The Prince in the 1500s, that encourages “the end justifies the means” behavior, especially among politicians.

Do ends justify means essay?

Leon Trotsky, a Marxist revolutionary, concluded that “

Means can only be justified by the end

. But the end, in turn, needs to be justified.” Marxists believe that if the results made people have more control over nature or destroyed one person’s power over others, then the end result is for the greater good.

Did Bismarck’s ends justify his means?

Bismarck understood it would not be easy to draw the German states into a unified whole under Prussian leadership. He crafted a strategy similar to Machiavelli’s “let the end justify the means.” Realpolitik, as it came to known, meant

an unyielding drive to achieve national goals at any cost

.

What is Machiavellian behavior?

Machiavellianism is a personality trait that

denotes cunningness, the ability to be manipulative

, and a drive to use whatever means necessary to gain power. Machiavellianism is one of the traits that forms the Dark Triad, along with narcissism and psychopathy.

Is being Machiavellian good?

High Machs can exhibit high levels of charisma, and their leadership can be beneficial in some areas. The presence of Machiavellianism in an organisation has been positively correlated with counterproductive workplace behaviour and workplace deviance.

What is Machiavellian theory?

Machiavelli believed that

public and private morality had to be understood as two different things in order to rule well

. … Machiavelli believed that, for a ruler, it was better to be widely feared than to be greatly loved; a loved ruler retains authority by obligation, while a feared leader rules by fear of punishment.

What was Bismarck’s rule?

Otto von Bismarck served as prime minister

of Prussia

(1862–73, 1873–90) and was the founder and first chancellor (1871–90) of the German Empire.

Can a Machiavellian love?

Previous research has demonstrated the manner in which Machiavellianism influences sexual and romantic relationships (Brewer & Abell, 2015a). In particular, men and women with high levels of Machiavellianism

prefer emotionally detached relationships

and are often reluctant to commit (Ali & Chamorro-Premuzic, 2010).

How can you tell if someone is Machiavellian?

“Machiavellians are

sly, deceptive, distrusting, and manipulative

. They are characterized by cynical and misanthropic beliefs, callousness, a striving for … money, power, and status, and the use of cunning influence tactics.

Amira Khan
Author
Amira Khan
Amira Khan is a philosopher and scholar of religion with a Ph.D. in philosophy and theology. Amira's expertise includes the history of philosophy and religion, ethics, and the philosophy of science. She is passionate about helping readers navigate complex philosophical and religious concepts in a clear and accessible way.