Bakke, ruling in which, on June 28, 1978, the U.S. Supreme Court declared
affirmative action constitutional but invalidated the use of racial quotas
.
What was the Bakke case and how did it address affirmative action?
In Regents of University of California v. Bakke (1978), the Supreme Court ruled that a university’s use of racial “quotas” in its admissions process was unconstitutional, but
a school’s use of “affirmative action” to accept more minority applicants was constitutional in some circumstances
.
How did the Bakke case answer the issue of affirmative action?
The case had divided the Court: Four justices agreed with Bakke that the university’s affirmative-action strategy
violated Title VI because it put a cap on the number of white students who could get in
. (Those justices did not take up the Fourteenth Amendment question.)
How did Regents v Bakke change affirmative policies?
The Regents v Bakke changed affirmative action policies
in that it struck down the use of strict racial quotas
. The Supreme Court agreed that the University’s use of racial quotas was against the Constitution and ordered the University to accept Bakke.
What did the Supreme Court rule in the Bakke decision regarding affirmative action quizlet?
Bakke (1978), the Supreme Court ruled that a university’s use of racial “quotas” in its admissions process was unconstitutional, but a school’s use of “
affirmative action” to accept more minority applicants was constitutional in some circumstances
.
What are pros and cons of affirmative action?
| Affirmative Action Pros Affirmative Action Cons | Affirmative Action can reduce poverty Affirmative Action may be costly | Can give minorities better chances in life Affirmative Action may not be fair | Can improve job opportunities Can lead to plenty of frustration |
|---|
Who is responsible for affirmative action?
President Lyndon B. Johnson issued E.O. 11246, requiring
all government contractors and subcontractors
to take affirmative action to expand job opportunities for minorities.
What was the significance of Regents v Bakke?
In Regents of University of California v. Bakke (1978), the Supreme Court ruled that
a university’s use of racial “quotas” in its admissions process was unconstitutional
, but a school’s use of “affirmative action” to accept more minority applicants was constitutional in some circumstances.
How has immigration changed since the 1960s quizlet?
How has immigration changed since the 1960s?
Immigration was low in the 1960s, and has gradually increased.
Who hears evidence and offers a verdict?
The judge
makes a decision or the jury gives its verdict, based on the testimony and other evidence presented during trial. 8.
What did the Supreme Court rule in the Bakke case quizlet?
Bakke case? Alan Bakke, a white applicant to the University of California Davis School of Medicine, claimed he had been discriminated against by the university on the basis of his race. … The Supreme Court ruled in a 5-4 decision
that Bakke’s rejection was illegal and order the medical school to admit him.
What was the significance of Allan Bakke’s Supreme Court case quizlet?
The court ruled in favor of Allan Bakke saying
that racial quotas violated equal protection under the law in the 14th amendment
. The court ordered that Bakke be admitted to The University of California.
What was the first major affirmative action case ruled on by the Supreme Court quizlet?
The case of University of California Regents v. Bakke
was the first dispute over affirmative action policy in the U.S. Supreme Court.
What is the disadvantage of affirmative action?
A disadvantage of affirmative action is that
the program often compels employers to potentially overlook highly qualified applicants in favor of only marginally qualified applicants who meet affirmative action standards
.
What are cons of affirmative action?
- Reverse discrimination. Reverse discrimination is the notion that instead of promoting anti-discrimination, affirmative action leads to discrimination against individuals and groups that come from non-disadvantaged backgrounds. …
- Lack of meritocracy. …
- Demeaning true achievement.
What is the purpose of affirmative action?
The purpose of affirmative action is
to establish fair access to employment opportunities to create a workforce
that is an accurate reflection of the demographics of the qualified available workforce in the relevant job market.
