According to Zimbardo and his colleagues, the Stanford Prison Experiment revealed
how people will readily conform to the social roles they are expected to play
, especially if the roles are as strongly stereotyped as those of the prison guards.
How did the Stanford Prison Experiment change psychology?
Significance. The Stanford Prison Experiment has become one of psychology’s most dramatic
illustrations of how good people can be transformed into perpetrators of evil
, and healthy people can begin to experience pathological reactions – traceable to situational forces.
What ethical principles did the Stanford Prison Experiment violate?
The study has received many ethical criticisms, including
lack of fully informed consent
by participants as Zimbardo himself did not know what would happen in the experiment (it was unpredictable). Also, the prisoners did not consent to being ‘arrested’ at home.
What was the major flaw in the Stanford Prison Experiment?
What was the major flaw in the Stanford prison experiment?
Zimbardo did not use a control group
. Roger and Joan have passion in their relationship, and they agree they will support each other. But when it comes to sharing their thoughts, they lack intimacy.
Was there bias in the Stanford Prison Experiment?
The day before the experiment began, Zimbardo’s team coached the “guards” about their roles and what was and wasn’t acceptable for them to do to “prisoners.” One recurring critique of SPE is that
participants were biased in their behavior based on demand characteristics
.
Who was Prisoner 8612?
One of the prisoners (#8612),
Douglas Korpi
, a 22-year-old Berkeley graduate, began to exhibit uncontrollable crying and rage 36 hours into the experiment, described by Zimbardo as “acute emotional disturbance”.
Why is Zimbardo’s experiment unethical?
As for the ethics of the experiment, Zimbardo said he believed the experiment was ethical before it began but
unethical in hindsight because he and the others involved had no idea the experiment would escalate to the point of abuse that it did
. … It’s hard to perceive the whole process,” Zimbardo said.
What is a major problem with the original Milgram study?
What is a major problem with the original Milgram study?
Milgram lied to his respondents, making his study borderline unethical
. What is the major flaw in the Asch conformity study? Asch ignored the importance of several factors influencing conformity- race, class, and gender.
What was the most serious charge leveled against the Milgram experiment?
One of the more serious charges leveled against Milgram’s paper was the
original sin of social science research: sample bias
.
What happened in the Milgram experiment?
The Milgram experiment(s) on obedience to authority
Is the Milgram experiment accurate?
In the 1960s, Stanley Milgram’s electric-shock studies showed that people will obey even the most abhorrent of orders. In the most well-known variation of the experiment,
a full 65 percent of people went all the way
. …
What was Milgram’s hypothesis?
The hypothesis tested in the Milgram experiment was that,
under the right circumstances, people would follow the directions of an authority figure to the extent of harming or even killing other people
.
What was the Milgram shock experiment?
The goal of the Milgram experiment was
to test the extent of humans’ willingness to obey orders from an authority figure
. Participants were told by an experimenter to administer increasingly powerful electric shocks to another individual.
What were the subjects in the Milgram experiment asked to do quizlet?
Milgram wanted to
investigate whether Germans were particularly obedient to authority figures
as this was a common explanation for the nazi killings in WW2. It is hypothesised that the teacher will obey the authroity figure and inflict pain on the learner.
What were the subjects in the Milgram experiment asked to do?
Milgram recruited subjects for his experiments from various walks in life. Respondents were told the experiment would
study the effects of punishment on learning ability
. They were offered a token cash award for participating.
What was the primary conclusion of Stanley Milgram’s obedience research?
Stanley Milgram reached the conclusion that
people would obey instructions from those who they saw as legitimate authority figures
, even if the instructions they received were to do something to harm another person. From this, Milgram concluded that people were socialized to follow immoral or unlawful orders.
