Conflict theorists argue
that stratification is dysfunctional and harmful in society
. According to conflict theory, social stratification benefits the rich and powerful at the expense of the poor. Thus, it creates a system of winners and losers that is maintained by those who are on the top.
How do conflict theorists view stratification quizlet?
The conflict theory of social inequality holds that stratification exists because it benefits individuals and groups who have the power to dominate and exploit others. Marx contended that the capitalist drive to realize surplus value is the foundation of modern class struggle.
Why is social stratification universal according to conflict and functionalist theorists? …
The groups that gain power use that power to manipulate, control, and exploit the groups “beneath them
.” Members of the ruling elite in every society develop ideologies that justify their society’s social stratification system.
Social conflict theorists disagree that social stratification is functional for a society. Instead, they
argue that social stratification benefits some at the expense of others
. … He based his theory on the idea that society has two classes of people: the bourgeoisie and the proletariat.
The functionalist perspective
states that systems exist in society for good reasons
. Conflict theorists
The functional theory of stratification provided by Kingsley Davis and Wilbert Moore suggests that
social inequalities are functional for society
because they provide an incentive for the most talented individuals to occupy jobs that are essential to the orderly maintenance of a society.
The functionalist perspective
states that systems exist in society for good reasons
. Conflict theorists observe that stratification promotes inequality, such as between rich business owners and poor workers. Symbolic interactionists
What are some examples of conflict theory?
- Occupy Wall Street. …
- The Education System. …
- The Criminal Justice System. …
- #MeToo Movement. …
- Race and Black Lives Matter. …
- Proposition 8.
What are the four basic principles of stratification?
Social stratification is based on four basic principles which includes Social stratification is a trait of society, not simply a reflection of individual differences; Social stratification carries over from generation to generation; Social
stratification is universal
but variable; Social stratification involves not …
What are the 3 sociological perspectives on health and illness?
List the assumptions of the
functionalist, conflict, and symbolic interactionist perspectives
on health and medicine.
What is most effective in maintaining society’s stratification?
Which of the following is most effective in maintaining society’s stratification?
Most Industrialized, Industrializing, and Least Industrialized
.
What is the functionalist view of family?
For functionalists, the family
creates well-integrated members of society and instills culture into the new members of society
. It provides important ascribed statuses such as social class and ethnicity to new members. It is responsible for social replacement by reproducing new members, to replace its dying members.
How important is family in society?
Family is considered as one of the most important units of society because
it contributes to child-rearing and your place in adulthood
. Also referred to as anuclear family, itprovides necessary forms of support that are significant to your emotional, mental and physical wellbeing.
Social stratification is a process by which a society is divided into different layers, or strata, based on factors like level of education, occupation, income, and wealth. … For example, those
in the same social class tend to have the same types of jobs and similar levels of income
.
Social stratification can be examined from different sociological perspectives
The distribution of good things in general
, which is to some extent controlled by the sheer power aspect of upper-class position, is dysfunctional, in other words, if it begins to undermine the value system and transform “normal” criticism from below into class rancor.
