How Often Do Papers Get Rejected?

by Juan MartinezLast updated on January 30, 2024Education and Communications4 min read
Practical Life Information

Several studies suggest that at least 20 percent of published articles were first rejected by another journal. An older study found that about 1 percent of published articles were rejected by four or more journals before being accepted.

How many times a paper is rejected?

Several studies suggest that at least 20 percent of published articles were first rejected by another journal. An older study found that about 1 percent of published articles were rejected by four or more journals before being accepted.

How often do scientific papers get rejected?

At Cell, Nature and Science, out of every 100 submissions received, merely three make it through the editor’s review and then peer review. In other words, rejection rates in these journals are as high as 97 percent ! Even at journals where screening is comparatively relaxed, acceptance rates rarely exceed 40 percent.

Why do papers get rejected?

The reasons for a paper being rejected once it has been reviewed fall mainly into two categories: (1) problems with the research ; and (2) problems with the writing/presentation of the paper. A paper may be rejected because of problems with the research on which it is based.

How long does it take for a paper to be rejected?

Desk rejects are usually quite quick (e.g., 1 to 4 weeks is common in my experience). Note that not all journals do desk rejects, and many journals vary in how much they filter at this stage.

Can a paper be rejected after acceptance?

The author represents that the paper has not been and will not be published elsewhere and agrees to abide by journal requirements, and to convey the manuscript and its copyright solely to that journal. ... The editor has made a commitment to publish the article.

What is the most common cause of rejection?

Technical reasons for rejection include: Incomplete data such as too small a sample size or missing or poor controls . Poor analysis such as using inappropriate statistical tests or a lack of statistics altogether.

What are two most common reasons for manuscript rejection?

  • Lack of Novelty, originality, and presentation of obsolete study. ...
  • Improper rationale. ...
  • Unimportant and irrelevant subject matter. ...
  • Flaws in methodology. ...
  • Lack of interpretations. ...
  • Inappropriate or incomplete statistics.

How long does it take for a paper to be approved?

Typically the acceptance of a research article by any standard journal takes anywhere between 6 months to one year . There are some open access journals that can accept the research articles in two to three months of time.

How long does it take for a paper to be accepted?

Typically the acceptance of a research article by any standard journal takes anywhere between 6 months to one year . There are some open access journals that can accept the research articles in two to three months of time. Actually, there are several websites reveal the journal review speed.

How long does a paper take to get accepted?

Typically the acceptance of a research article by any standard journal takes anywhere between 6 months to one year . There are some open access journals that can accept the research articles in two to three months of time.

Is desk rejection bad?

A desk-reject means your manuscript has been rejected by a journal without being sent out for review . ... So for many academics a desk-reject causes extreme disappointment, a feeling that can easily change to desperation if this same outcome is repeated over and over again.

What do you do after paper rejection?

  1. Appeal the rejection. ...
  2. Resubmit to the same journal. ...
  3. Make changes and submit to a different journal. ...
  4. Make no changes and submit to another journal. ...
  5. File the manuscript away and never resubmit it.
Juan Martinez
Author

Juan is an education and communications expert who writes about learning strategies, academic skills, and effective communication.

Is A Term Coined In 1972 By The Knapp Commission That Refers To Officers Who Engage In Minor Acts Of Corrupt Practices Eg Accepting Gratuities And Passively Accepting The Wrongdoings Of Other Officers?