Schroeder: Why the end doesn’t justify the means, but the means can always justify the end. … But as young kids, we learned that the “end doesn’t justify the means.” In other words,
a positive outcome isn’t, well, a good thing if the methods used were dishonest or harmful to others
.
Does the end ever justify the means examples?
A good outcome excuses any wrongs committed to attain it. For example, He’s campaigning with illegal funds on the theory that
if he wins the election the end will justify
the means, or The officer tricked her into admitting her guilt—the end sometimes justifies the means.
Do the ends ever justify the means?
—used to say that
a desired result is so good or important that any method, even a morally bad one, may be used to achieve it They believe
that the end justifies the means
Who believed the end always justifies the means?
“The ends justify the means.” –
Niccolò Machiavelli
Do ends always justify means essay?
Leon Trotsky, a Marxist revolutionary, concluded that “
Means can only be justified by the end
. But the end, in turn, needs to be justified.” Marxists believe that if the results made people have more control over nature or destroyed one person’s power over others, then the end result is for the greater good.
Does the end goal justify the means or vice versa?
A characteristic behavior in today’s society is the belief that the ends justifies the means. This means
actions people take are justified regardless of
how they go about achieving their desired end result.
What means the end of an act?
THE END OF AN ACT The end of the act is
the natural termination of an activity
. The end of eating is nourishment; that of reading is comprehension, that of basketball is scoring a goal, and that of jogging is physical exercise. The end of the doer is the personal purpose intended by the person performing the act.
What does Machiavellian mean today?
Someone Machiavellian is
sneaky, cunning, and lacking a moral code
. The word comes from the Italian philosopher Niccolò Machiavelli, who wrote the political treatise The Prince in the 1500s, that encourages “the end justifies the means” behavior, especially among politicians.
Did Bismarck’s ends justify his means?
Bismarck understood it would not be easy to draw the German states into a unified whole under Prussian leadership. He crafted a strategy similar to Machiavelli’s “let the end justify the means.” Realpolitik, as it came to known, meant
an unyielding drive to achieve national goals at any cost
.
What are the kinds of an end?
- Resolved ending.
- Unresolved ending.
- Expanded ending.
- Unexpected ending.
- Ambiguous ending.
- Tied ending.
What is the difference between the end of an act and the end of the agent?
The end of the action- the natural purpose of an act; or that is which the act in its very nature terminates or results, thus, the end of the action of studying is learning. The end of the agent-
the intention or aim of the doer of the action
.
What is the ultimate end of a person?
The alternative proposed is that human beings’ true ultimate end is
fulfillment in God’s kingdom
, a communion of divine Persons and created persons, in which human members will be fulfilled with respect to all the goods proper to their nature.
What is Machiavellianism personality?
Machiavellianism is a personality trait that denotes
cunningness, the ability to be manipulative
, and a drive to use whatever means necessary to gain power. Machiavellianism is one of the traits that forms the Dark Triad, along with narcissism and psychopathy.
What is Machiavellian theory?
Machiavelli believed that
public and private morality had to be understood as two different things in order to rule well
. … Machiavelli believed that, for a ruler, it was better to be widely feared than to be greatly loved; a loved ruler retains authority by obligation, while a feared leader rules by fear of punishment.
Is being Machiavellian good?
High Machs can exhibit high levels of charisma, and their leadership can be beneficial in some areas. The presence of Machiavellianism in an organisation has been positively correlated with counterproductive workplace behaviour and workplace deviance.
What was Bismarck’s rule?
Otto von Bismarck served as prime minister
of Prussia
(1862–73, 1873–90) and was the founder and first chancellor (1871–90) of the German Empire.
