Is Begging The Question Invalid?

by | Last updated on January 24, 2024

, , , ,

Begging the question is

not considered

a formal fallacy (an argument that is defective because it uses an incorrect deductive step). Rather, it is a type of informal fallacy that is logically valid but unpersuasive, in that it fails to prove anything other than what is already assumed.

Why is begging the question wrong?

Minor Premise: To say or write “begs the question” when you mean “raises the question” is

a mistake

. Conclusion: If you use it that way, you may be dismissed or ridiculed. It turns out that “begging the question” is a technical term of logic which has been appropriated for countless uses outside of logic.

What is begging the question examples?

  • Everyone wants the new iPhone because it is the hottest new gadget on the market!
  • God is real because the Bible says so, and the Bible is from God.
  • Killing people is wrong, so the death penalty is wrong.
  • Smoking cigarettes can kill you because cigarettes are deadly.

What does it mean when someone is begging the question?

The fallacy of begging the question occurs when an argument’s premises assume the truth of the conclusion, instead of supporting it. In other words, you assume without proof the stand/position, or a significant part of the stand, that is in question. Begging the question is also called

arguing in a circle

.

Are question begging arguments sound?

Technically speaking, to beg the question is

not a logical fallacy

Is begging the question a tautology?

Used in this sense, the word beg means “to avoid,” not “ask” or “lead to.” Begging the question is also known as a

circular argument

, tautology, and petitio principii (Latin for “seeking the beginning”).

Why is begging the question called begging the question?

Sometimes it is confused with “dodging the question”, an attempt to avoid it. The phrase begging the question originated in the 16th century as

a mistranslation of the Latin

petitio principii, which in turn was a mistranslation of the Greek for “assuming the conclusion”.

What is the difference between circular reasoning and begging the question?


Begging the question is closely related to circular reasoning

, and in modern usage the two generally refer to the same thing. Circular reasoning is often of the form: “A is true because B is true; B is true because A is true.” Circularity can be difficult to detect if it involves a longer chain of propositions.

How do you beg the question properly?

The term “begging the question” is

just circular reasoning

What is a false cause?

Summary. This chapter focuses on one of the common fallacies in Western philosophy: ‘false cause’. In general, the false cause fallacy

occurs when the “link between premises and conclusion depends on some imagined causal connection that probably does not exist”

.

What is an example of non sequitur?

A non sequitur is

a conclusion or reply that doesn’t follow logically from the previous statement

. You’ve probably heard an example of a non sequitur before, therefore bunny rabbits are way cuter than chipmunks. Non sequiturs are often used for comedic effect in movies, novels, and TV shows.

What is red herring fallacy?

This fallacy consists in diverting attention from the real issue by focusing instead on an issue having only a surface relevance to the first. Examples: Son:

“Wow, Dad, it’s really hard to make a living on my salary.” Father: “Consider yourself lucky, son.

What is an example of a straw man argument?


Making a decision

is a popular time for straw man arguments to arise. For example, imagine a husband and a wife are trying to decide whether they should adopt a dog or a cat. Wife: I’d rather have a dog than a cat.

Why is begging the question important?

Begs the question is actually a term that comes from logic, and it’s used to

indicate that someone has made a conclusion based on a premise that lacks support

(1, 2).

Is tautology a fallacy?

A tautology in math (and logic) is a compound statement (premise and conclusion) that always produces truth. No matter what the individual parts are, the result is a true statement; a tautology is always true. The opposite of a tautology is a

contradiction or a fallacy

, which is “always false”.

Amira Khan
Author
Amira Khan
Amira Khan is a philosopher and scholar of religion with a Ph.D. in philosophy and theology. Amira's expertise includes the history of philosophy and religion, ethics, and the philosophy of science. She is passionate about helping readers navigate complex philosophical and religious concepts in a clear and accessible way.