In “The Case for Animal Rights,” Tom Regan takes
a Kantian approach
and believes that like humans, animals should be treated as ends-in-themselves. … Regan argues that because animals have an inherent value, they shouldn’t be used in order to benefit human lives.
What did Tom Regan believe in?
Tom Regan is Professor Emeritus of Philosophy at North Carolina State University. He is also an uncompromising ‘Animal Rights Advocate’ (ARA). In his latest book Empty Cages – Facing the Challenge of Animal Rights he argues that
human beings should not enslave non-human animals and use them as means to their ends
.
Is Tom Regan an abolitionist?
| Abolitionism | Description The legal ownership of non-human animals should be abolished. | Proponents Gary Francione Tom Regan | Subject Animal rights, ethics, law, philosophy |
|---|
Why is Tom Regan important?
Tom Regan, an American moral philosopher known for his
groundbreaking work in the study of animal rights
, died of pneumonia Friday, Feb. … Though he wrote many books and papers, his most notable work was “The Case for Animal Rights,” published in 1983 near the beginning of the modern animal movement.
Is Tom Regan a deontology?
What about
Tom Regan’s
position?
Tom Regan
on the other hand adopts a
deontological
rights position which is the view that animals, like men are “ends in themselves” and therefore ought not to be exploited. Animals and humans have equal rights.
Why does Regan reject utilitarianism?
Unlike Singer,
Regan
argues against a
utilitarianism
perspective when considering animal equality.
Utilitarianism has
no room for the equal rights of different individuals because it
has
no room for their equal inherent value.
What does Tom Regan say about animal rights?
The Case for Animal Rights is a 1983 book by the American philosopher Tom Regan, in which the author argues that
at least some kinds of non-human animals have moral rights because they are the “subjects-of-a-life
,” and that these rights adhere to them whether or not they are recognized.
Was Tom Regan a vegetarian?
Tom Regan became
a lacto-ovo-vegetarian in the summer of 1972
and transitioned to being a complete vegan shortly thereafter. During his time working as a butcher in his college years, Regan never saw the negative impact of his lifestyle.
Which Greek philosopher said that there are humans that are human like but not human?
Anthropocentrism interprets or regards the world in terms of human values and experiences.
What does Peter Singer believe about animal rights?
Singer’s
theory does not concern rights
since Singer does not believe that animals or humans have rights. Indeed, Singer himself refers to his theory as one of “animal liberation” and states that claims of right are “irrelevant.” “The language of rights is a convenient political shorthand.
What is the source of inherent value for a being?
The intrinsic value of a human, or any other sentient animal, is value which
originates within itself
, the value it confers on itself by desiring its own lived experience as an end in itself. Intrinsic value exists wherever self-valuing beings exist.
What does Tom Regan argue?
Tom Regan argues that
human beings and some non-human animals have moral rights
because they are “subjects of lives,” that is, roughly, conscious, sentient beings with an experiential welfare.
Does Carl Cohen think animals have rights why?
Cohen argues that
animals have no rights
– a right properly understood is a claim or potential claim, that one party may exercise against another. … Rights arise and can be defended only among beings who actually do or can make moral claims against one another.
What do you call the unjustifiable privileging of one’s own species over another?
Speciesism
, the unjustified privileging of one’s own species (in moral theory and everyday. practice), has received much philosophical attention since the term was popularized by.
Can animals have rights like humans?
Human animals have rights. There
is no morally relevant difference
between human animals and adult mammals.
What does Regan mean by inherent value quizlet?
Regan argues that
subjects-of-a-life have
inherent value and are entitled to respectful treatment. Those animals and humans that have equal inherent value deserve equal treatment, which supports his argument that animals deserve to be granted their rights.
