Skip to main content

Should You Believe A Claim When The Experts Disagree About It?

by
Last updated on 4 min read

The important principle here is this: If a claim conflicts with expert opinion, we have good reason to doubt it . We must couple this principle with another one: When the experts disagree about a claim, we have good reason to doubt it.

When should we doubt a claim?

We doubt a claim when we are lacking certainty and reliability regarding those who are making the claim, the sources of the claim, or when the things about which the claim is being made are not sufficiently justified, that is sufficient reasons have not been supplied for the claim.

When a claim conflicts with our prior knowledge we tend to?

Terms in this set (46)

– if a claim conflicts with our background information then we have good reason to doubt it .

What are the problems of resisting contrary evidence?

Resisting Contrary Evidence

When something challenges a cherished belief , we tend to deny evidence, ignore it, or reinterpret it so that it fits better with our prejudices. This often happens when one is emotionally tied to believing something. The emotional tie make you blind to the relevant evidence.

When experts disagree about a claim we have good reason to quizlet?

If a claim conflicts with expert opinion we have good reason to doubt it . When the experts disagree about a claim we have good reason to doubt it. You just studied 16 terms!

When multiple experts disagree about a claim we have reason to doubt it?

We must couple this principle with another one: When the experts disagree about a claim, we have good reason to doubt it . When we rely on bogus expert opinion, we commit the fallacy known as the appeal to authority. Many claims are based on nothing more than personal experience, ours or someone else’s.

When many experts disagree about a claim we have good reason to?

The important principle is: If a claim conflicts with expert opinion, we have good reason to doubt it. We must couple this principle with another one: When the experts disagree about a claim, we have good reason to doubt it. When we rely on bogus expert opinion, we commit the fallacy known as the appeal to authority.

On what grounds can you doubt a claim?

  • Many claims are based on nothing more than personal experience, ours or someone else’s. ...
  • Some common factors that can raise such doubts are impairment (stress, injury, distraction, emotional upset, and the like), expectation, and our limited abilities in judging probabilities.

What counts as good evidence for a claim?

Evidence is the concrete facts used to support a claim. Ideally, evidence is something everyone agrees on, or something that anyone could, with sufficient training and equipment, verify for themselves .

What counts as good justification for a claim?

The knowledge claim is justified with adequate evidence . Justification requires Coherence with previous data and Clarity with regard to language and logic. There can be no Contradiction or strong Counter evidence.

What is EWT psychology?

It refers to an account given by people of an event they have witnessed . For example they may be required to give a description at a trial of a robbery or a road accident someone has seen. ... Eyewitness testimony is an important area of research in cognitive psychology and human memory.

Is eyewitness testimony usually accurate?

Research has found that eyewitness-identification testimony can be very unreliable . ... Although witnesses can often be very confident that their memory is accurate when identifying a suspect, the malleable nature of human memory and visual perception makes eyewitness testimony one of the most unreliable forms of evidence.

What principle should guide our judgments about advertising?

What principle should guide our judgements about advertising? We generally have good reason to doubt advertising claims and to be wary of advertising’s persuasive powers .

What are some ways people resist contrary evidence?

What are some ways that people resist contrary evidence? Deny, ignore, or reinterpret it so it fits with our prejudices.

When we regard a nonexpert as an expert we Group of answer choices?

When we regard a nonexpert as an expert, we ... The error of thinking that previous events can affect the probabilities in the random event at hand . A statement about the causes of things.

When our perceptual powers are impaired or impeded we?

If our perceptual powers are impaired or impeded, we have reasons to doubt them . -Also, our perception/memory are constructive, which means that what we perceive and remember is to some degree fabricated by our minds so might not be accurate.

This article was researched and written with AI assistance, then verified against authoritative sources by our editorial team.
FixAnswer Philosophy Team
Written by

Covering ethical questions, spiritual practices, world religions, and philosophical concepts.

Is A Term Coined In 1972 By The Knapp Commission That Refers To Officers Who Engage In Minor Acts Of Corrupt Practices Eg Accepting Gratuities And Passively Accepting The Wrongdoings Of Other Officers?