What Was The Basic Decision In The Tarasoff Case? In the Tarasoff case, the court held that a psychotherapist, to whom a patient had confided a murderous intent, had a duty to protect the intended victim from harm. This duty includes warning the third party at risk, among other interventions. What were the implications of
Who Killed Tarasoff? On Oct. 27, 1969, Poddar stabbed and killed Tarasoff at her home. After the killing, Poddar called the police, confessed and asked to be handcuffed. Tarasoff’s parents sued Moore and other employees of the University, in a legal action that would be memorialized as Tarasoff v. What is the Tarasoff ruling? In
What Was The Tarasoff Decision? In 1985, the California legislature codified the Tarasoff rule: California law now provides that a psychotherapist has a duty to protect or warn a third party only if the therapist actually believed or predicted that the patient posed a serious risk of inflicting serious bodily injury upon a reasonably identifiable