The Court held that
a school district violated students’ free speech rights when it singled out a form of symbolic speech
– black armbands worn in protest of the Vietnam War – for prohibition, without proving the armbands would cause substantial disruption in class.
What was the outcome of Tinker v Des Moines quizlet?
In 1969 the United States Supreme Court ruled in a 7-2 decision in favor of the students. The
court agreed that students rights should be protected and said
, “Students don’t shed their constitutional rights at the school house gates.”
What led to Tinker v Des Moines and what was its outcome?
In a 7-2 decision, the Supreme Court’s majority ruled that
neither students nor teachers “shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate
.” The Court took the position that school officials could not prohibit only on the suspicion that the speech might disrupt the learning …
Decision. Yes. The Supreme Court ruled that the armbands were a form of symbolic speech, which
is protected by the First Amendment
, and therefore the school had violated the students’ First Amendment rights.
Why is the Tinker case important?
The Tinker case is a
very important decision protecting student rights
. Because five Des Moines students were brave enough to stand up for an unpopular position, all American students enjoy greater freedom to express their opinions.
What was tinkers argument?
In Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, 393 U.S. 503 (1969), the Supreme Court ruled that
public school officials cannot censor student expression unless they can reasonably forecast that the speech will substantially disrupt school activities or invade the rights of others
.
Why did the Supreme Court find in favor of the students in the Tinker case?
In 1969 the United States Supreme Court ruled in a 7-2 decision in favor of the students. The
high court agreed that students’ free rights should be protected and said
, “Students don’t shed their constitutional rights at the school house gates.”
How did Tinker v Des Moines impact society?
Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District remains a frequently cited Supreme Court precedent. Thanks to the ruling, over the years the ACLU has
successfully defended the right of students to wear an anti-abortion armband
, a pro-LGBT T-shirt, and shirts critical of political figures.
What was the outcome of the Tinker?
In a 7-2 decision, the Supreme Court’s majority ruled that
neither students nor teachers “shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate
.” The Court took the position that school officials could not prohibit only on the suspicion that the speech might disrupt the learning …
What was the main result of Morse v Frederick quizlet?
What was the ruling in this case? The Supreme Court ruled that
Frederick’s First Amendment rights were not violated
and that “schools may take steps to safeguard those entrusted to their care from speech that can reasonably be regarded as encouraging illegal drug use.”
Why did the Supreme Court find their suspension unconstitutional?
Why did the Supreme Court find their suspension unconstitutional? The Supreme Court found their suspension unconstitutional
because the arm bands were considered “Pure Speech
.” The armbands did not cause interference with school work. … Wearing armbands counted as symbolic speech.
What other forms of student speech in school are protected under the Tinker decision?
The Court in Fraser distinguished the political speech of the Tinker armbands with the vulgar and lewd words chosen by Matthew Fraser. The result was a new rule – public school officials can prohibit student speech
that is vulgar, lewd, or plainly offensive
.
Why was Justice Black so concerned about the Court’s decision in the Tinker case?
Justice Hugo Black dissented. He pointed out that the
case involved a small number of students who refused to obey the instructions of school officials
, and argued that allowing this behavior would have a negative effect on schools and on the country as a whole.
What is the Tinker standard?
1. The Tinker Standard (Tinker v. Des Moines Independent School District, 1969) This is
the first case to define acceptable student speech in schools
. … In order to ban potentially disruptive expression, schools must prove that the expression would cause a “reasonable” disruption or violate the rights of other students.
Why did the school district argue it could prevent students from wearing black armbands?
Because the appearance of the armbands distracted students from their work,
they detracted from the ability of the school officials to perform their duties
, so the school district was well within its rights to discipline the students.
What is the Tinker test?
The substantial disruption test is the major standard developed by the U.S. Supreme Court in its seminal student speech K-12 decision Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969) meant
to determine when public school officials may discipline students for their expression
.