To eliminate Little Albert’s conditioned fear they
could have shown a rat many times without a loud noise (UCS) following
. … Even after Little Albert’s fear had been extinguished – most likely the fear would come back – spontaneous recovery.
How did Watson condition the fear response in Albert?
Method. The aim of Watson and Rayner was to condition a phobia in an emotionally stable child. … At this point, Watson and Rayner made
a loud sound behind Albert’s back by striking a suspended steel bar with a hammer each time the baby touched the rat
. Albert responded to the noise by crying and showing fear.
What did John Watson do to Little Albert?
Albert was a 9-month-old baby who had not previously demonstrated any fear of rats. In the beginning of the experiment, when Albert was 11 months old, John Watson placed
a rat
(in addition to some other animals and objects with fur) on the table in front of Albert, who reacted with curiosity and no sign of fear.
How did John B Watson demonstrate classical conditioning through his work with Little Albert?
Little Albert was frightened by the sound
—demonstrating a reflexive fear of sudden loud noises—and began to cry. Watson repeatedly paired the loud sound with the white rat. … Watson had succeeded in conditioning a fear response in Little Albert, thus demonstrating that emotions could become conditioned responses.
Is Little Albert died?
But what of Albert Barger?
He died in 2007
after a long, happy life, says his niece. She says the family had no idea he might be Little Albert, and that his mum had hidden the fact that he was born out of wedlock.
What was the conclusion of the Little Albert experiment?
In conclusion, Watson and Rayner concluded that their hypothesis was correct, and
they could condition “little Albert” to fear something irrational
. Although their experiment was riddled with third variables such as age and mental ability.
What was Little Albert not afraid of?
At the time Watson and Rayner began their now-famous study, “Little Albert” was 11 months old. He was described as a remarkably stable infant who rarely displayed fear of anything. He was
not afraid of animals
, including the white laboratory rat.
What did Watson’s Little Albert experiment quizlet?
Terms in this set (2)
Watson & Rayner’s (1920) experiment on ‘Little Albert’ demonstrated that
classical conditioning principles could be applied to condition the emotional response of fear
.
What happened after Little Albert was classically conditioned to fear a tame white rat?
Terms in this set (198) Generalization occurred: Albert responded with fear to other furry animals and fuzzy objects. What happened after Watson classically conditioned “Little Albert” to fear a tame white rat? …
The conditioned fear response was quickly and easily extinguished.
What ethical principles were violated in the little Albert study?
No, there were ethical issues in Little Albert experiment. For instance, Watson
harmed little Albert by instilling the fear of white rats in him
. Such fear did not exist prior to the experiment. Further, Watson did not follow the principle of free consent and did not give participants the right to withdraw.
What was Watson trying to induce through conditioning?
In 1921, Watson studied Albert, an 11 month old infant child. The goal of the study was to condition Albert
to become afraid of a white rat by pairing the white rat with a very loud, jarring noise (UCS)
. … The implications of Watson’s experiment suggested that classical conditioning could cause some phobias in humans.
What did John B Watson learn about emotions and classical conditioning?
John Watson proposed that the process of classical conditioning (based on Pavlov’s observations)
was able to explain all aspects of human psychology
. Everything from speech to emotional responses was simply patterns of stimulus and response. Watson denied completely the existence of the mind or consciousness.
Who is the real Little Albert?
“Little Albert,” the baby behind John Watson’s famous 1920 emotional conditioning experiment at Johns Hopkins University, has been identified as
Douglas Merritte
, the son of a wetnurse named Arvilla Merritte who lived and worked at a campus hospital at the time of the experiment — receiving $1 for her baby’s …
Did Little Albert have parents?
– Albert’s
mother was a wet nurse
. Arvilla gave birth on 9 March 1919 and was listed as a foster mother on the 1920 Hopkins census. … Thus, Arvilla is one of very few women who could have been Albert’s mother. – Douglas was born on the Hopkins campus and cared for by his mother after she left the hospital.
How did little Albert get hydrocephalus?
They verify that Merritte indeed had congenital hydrocephalus, and recounted in disturbing detail treatments the child was subjected
to during his first year of life
, including repeated cranial and lumbar punctures to reduce fluid buildup in the brain.
What did the Little Albert experiment teach us?
The Little Albert Experiment demonstrated that
classical conditioning could be used to create a phobia
. A phobia is an irrational fear, that is out of proportion to the danger. In this experiment, a previously unafraid baby was conditioned to become afraid of a rat.
