The judge only has one rambling speech in the movie, and it goes something like this:
“To continue, you’ve listened to a long and complex case, murder in the first degree
. This speech sounds like something he wrote a long time ago and still recites at every murder trial. …
What specific instructions does the judge give the jury?
The judge will advise the jury that it is
the sole judge of the facts and of the credibility (believability) of witnesses
. He or she will note that the jurors are to base their conclusions on the evidence as presented in the trial, and that the opening and closing arguments of the lawyers are not evidence.
What instructions did the judge give to the jurors in 12 Angry Men?
The judge says
if they find him guilty they must have a beyond reasonable doubt
. All twelve jurors.
Why did each juror vote not guilty in 12 angry men?
Later Juror 3 says the whole case rests on the woman who claimed to be an eyewitness. …
The doubts about the evidence against the boy, the pressure of the other eleven jurors, and perhaps an ultimate understanding of his own motivations combine to
make him change his vote to “not guilty.”
What jurors voted guilty in 12 angry men?
The twelve men begin by taking a preliminary vote.
Eleven men vote
“guilty.” Only one man – Juror 8 – votes “not guilty.” The rest of the jurors are shocked, but Juror 8 says that he couldn’t sentence a boy to death without discussing it first.
Why is Juror 7 in a hurry?
What specific instructions does the judge give the jury? … why is juror 7 in such a hurry to leave?
He is supposed to see the seven year itch
. What is the result of the first vote?
How many jurors must vote not guilty?
9 jurors
vote not guilty and 3 jurors vote guilty.
Does the judge have to listen to the jury?
At the end of a trial,
the judge instructs the jury on the applicable law
. While the jury must obey the judge’s instructions as to the law, the jury alone is responsible for determining the facts of the case.
Who has more power judge or jury?
When there is no jury (“bench trial”), the judge makes rulings on both questions of law and of fact. In most continental European jurisdictions,
judges
have more power in a trial and the role and powers of a jury are often restricted.
Is the jury’s verdict final?
A verdict of guilty in a criminal case is generally followed by a judgment of conviction rendered by judge, which in turn be followed by sentencing. In U.S. legal nomenclature, the verdict is the finding of the jury on the questions of fact submitted to it. …
The judgment of the court is the final order in the case
.
What is the final verdict of 12 Angry Men?
The verdict of a seemingly open and shut case lies in the hands of twelve Jury members, the verdict is obvious,
guilty
.
What made Juror 3 vote not guilty?
Juror 3 does not work well with others. … Juror 3
changed his vote after realizing that all of his anger toward the defendant was a direct result of his bad relationship with his son
. Due to his change of vote from guilty to not guilty, Juror 3 shows growth in character and is therefore considered dynamic.
Why did Juror 9 change his vote not guilty?
Why had Nine changed his vote? Who is Nine? Nine changed his vote
because Juror number 8 had courage to stand against everyone else
, and he 8 gambled for support and made 9 want to hear more.
In what order did the 12 Angry Men vote not guilty?
The jurors who believe the boy to be not guilty in order are:
Juror #8 (Henry Fonda)
, Juror #9 (Joseph Sweeney), Juror #5 (Jack Klugman), Juror #11 (George Voskovec), Juror #2 (John Fiedler), Juror #6 (Edward Binns), Juror #7 (Jack Warden), Juror #12 (Robert Webber), The Foreman (Martin Balsam), Juror #10 (Ed Begley), …
Why is Juror 11 Juror 7 so closely?
why does juror 11 question juror 7 so closely about his willingness to change his vote? …
Juror 3 voted guilty
because he wanted to get it over with. He also didn’t have enough courage to stand alone, nor was able to give facts to back up his reasoning for saying the boy was guilty.
What does Juror #11 do for a living?
Number Eleven was Orignally from Germany, He Escaped. He was also a “watch maker”,Now he’s a
Juror who feels self-conscious about his foreign accent
. He is very serious about democracy and America’s legal system.
