Unfortunately, one of the Little Albert experiment ethical issues was that Little Albert was harmed during the experiment. This is because he was classically conditioned to fear white rats , and such fear did not exist earlier in baby Albert. This could also have resulted in Albert suffering for his entire life.
What disorder did Little Albert have?
They verify that Merritte indeed had congenital hydrocephalus , and recounted in disturbing detail treatments the child was subjected to during his first year of life, including repeated cranial and lumbar punctures to reduce fluid buildup in the brain.
What is unethical about the Little Albert experiment?
The experiment also raises many ethical concerns. Little Albert was harmed during this experiment—he left the experiment with a previously nonexistent fear. By today's standards, the Little Albert experiment would not be allowed .
What was the major criticism of the Little Albert experiment?
The experiment was not carefully designed or conducted, Little Albert's Fears were not Objectively Measured, but were Subjectively Observed. The experiment was unethical because Watson and Raynor, did not extinguish Little Albert's Fear Response to furry animals and objects .
Was the Little Albert experiment confidentiality?
Confidentiality . Written form of all aspects of the experiment . Must be signed by subject. Albert's mother Arvilla Merritte would have needed to give consent.
What was the conclusion of the Little Albert experiment?
In conclusion, Watson and Rayner concluded that their hypothesis was correct, and they could condition “little Albert” to fear something irrational . Although their experiment was riddled with third variables such as age and mental ability.
What Happened to baby Albert after testing?
Tragically, medical records showed that Douglas had severe neurological problems and died at an early age of hydrocephalus, or water on the brain . According to his records, this seems to have resulted in vision problems, so much so that at times he was considered blind.
What did we learn from the Little Albert Experiment?
The Little Albert Experiment demonstrated that classical conditioning —the association of a particular stimulus or behavior with an unrelated stimulus or behavior—works in human beings. In this experiment, a previously unafraid baby was conditioned to become afraid of a rat.
Why was Little Albert chosen?
The aim of Watson and Rayner was to condition a phobia in an emotionally stable child . For this study they chose a nine-month old infant from a hospital referred to as “Albert” for the experiment. Watson followed the procedures which Pavlov had used in his experiments with dogs.
What was the white rat in the Little Albert Experiment?
In the Little Albert Experiment the white rat was the conditioned stimulus . Behavior which is similar (but not necessarily the same) to the UCR, which is triggered by the CS after classical conditioning. Conditioned responses are learned. E.g. fear when presentation with the white rat.
What did Watson's Little Albert experiment quizlet?
Terms in this set (2)
Watson & Rayner's (1920) experiment on ‘Little Albert' demonstrated that classical conditioning principles could be applied to condition the emotional response of fear .
What was the unconditioned stimulus in the case of Little Albert quizlet?
In Watson's experiment with Little Albert, the white rat was the (conditioned, unconditioned) stimulus, and Albert's crying when the hammer struck the steel bar was the (conditioned, unconditioned) response.
What happened after Little Albert was classically conditioned to fear a tame white rat?
Terms in this set (198) Generalization occurred: Albert responded with fear to other furry animals and fuzzy objects. What happened after Watson classically conditioned “Little Albert” to fear a tame white rat? ... The conditioned fear response was quickly and easily extinguished.
What was the purpose of the Little Albert experiment quizlet?
TO MAKE SURE ALBERT WAS CAPABLE OF PRODUCING A FEAR RESPONSE ... “that this response by Albert was as convincing a case of a completely conditioned fear response as could have been theoretically pictured.
Why was the well of despair experiment unethical?
Harlow's experiments on rhesus monkeys were most definitely unethical. He mentally scarred the baby monkeys . He isolated them in stainless steel cages just to see the effect it would have. These monkeys were psychologically tortured for several years.
What year was Little Albert experiment?
“Little Albert,” the baby behind John Watson's famous 1920 emotional conditioning experiment at Johns Hopkins University, has been identified as Douglas Merritte, the son of a wetnurse named Arvilla Merritte who lived and worked at a campus hospital at the time of the experiment — receiving $1 for her baby's ...
