What Did The Northern States Want To Do About Counting Slaves Why?

by | Last updated on January 24, 2024

, , , ,

The Northern delegates and others opposed to slavery wanted to

count only free persons

, including free blacks in the North and South. Minimizing the percentage of the slave population counted for apportionment reduced the political power of slaveholding states.

How did the 3/5 compromise help the South?

The Three-Fifths compromise

gave southern states disproportionate representation in the House of Representatives relative to free states

, thereby helping the southern states to preserve slavery.

Why did the North want the 3/5 compromise?

Northern states wanted

to count slavery in high numbers

because that would put more of a tax burden on the South and less on the North. … Counting three out of five slaves toward each state’s population was agreed to by all states except New Hampshire and Rhode Island.

Where in the Constitution is the 3/5 compromise?


Article one, section two of

the Constitution of the United States declared that any person who was not free would be counted as three-fifths of a free individual for the purposes of determining congressional representation.

Who proposed 3/5 compromise?

It is ironic that it was a liberal northern delegate,

James Wilson of Pennsylvania

, who proposed the Three-Fifths Compromise, as a way to gain southern support for a new framework of government.

Who opposed the Three-Fifths Compromise?

The ratification of the United States Constitution was the subject of intense debate between 1787 and 1789.

What was the connection between the 3/5 compromise and taxes?

The 3/5 compromise

gave the south more representatives in the house and therefore more control over taxes

. The south would have liked 5/5 of the slaves counted toward representation giving the south more control over how the taxes would be spent.

Why did states with large populations favor the Virginia Plan?

The Virginia Plan was supported by the larger states

because of the resolution for proportional representation

. This meant that the more people a state has, the more representatives it gets in the legislature.

What did the three fifths compromise provide?

WHAT WAS THE THREE-FIFTHS COMPROMISE? It was part of a provision of the original Constitution that

dealt with how to allot seats in the House of Representatives and dole out taxes based on population

. State populations would be determined by “the whole Number of free Persons” and “three fifths of all other Persons.”

What was the date of the Three-Fifths Compromise?

All revenue measures would originate in the lower house. That compromise was approved

July 16, 1787

.

What was the Compromise of 1850 and what did it do?

The Compromise of 1850 consists of five laws passed in September of 1850 that dealt with

the issue of slavery and territorial expansion

. … As part of the Compromise of 1850, the Fugitive Slave Act was amended and the slave trade in Washington, D.C., was abolished.

Which of the following best describes the impact of the Three-Fifths Compromise?

The statement that best describes the overall impact of the Three-Fifths Compromise would be that “(D)

The compromise gave the southern states a clear majority in the House of Representatives

,” since this held that each slave in the south would count as 3/5 of a person in terms of representation …

What is the 3/5 compromise and why was it created?

The Three-fifths Compromise was

an agreement reached during the 1787 United States Constitutional Convention over the counting of slaves in determining a state’s total population

. This count would determine the number of seats in the House of Representatives and how much each state would pay in taxes.

Who proposed the Great Compromise?

Their so-called Great Compromise (or Connecticut Compromise in honor of its architects,

Connecticut delegates Roger Sherman and Oliver Ellsworth

) provided a dual system of congressional representation.

Which group benefited most from the Three-Fifths Compromise?

Counting the whole number of

slaves

benefited the Southern states and reinforced the institution of slavery. Minimizing the percentage of the slave population counted for apportionment reduced the political power of slaveholding states.

Which two states voted unanimously against the 3/5 compromise?

Which two states voted unanimously against the 3/5 compromise? Finally, James Madison suggested a compromise: a 5-to-3 ratio. All but two states–

New Hampshire and Rhode Island

–approved this recommendation. But because the Articles of Confederation required unanimous agreement, the proposal was defeated.

Leah Jackson
Author
Leah Jackson
Leah is a relationship coach with over 10 years of experience working with couples and individuals to improve their relationships. She holds a degree in psychology and has trained with leading relationship experts such as John Gottman and Esther Perel. Leah is passionate about helping people build strong, healthy relationships and providing practical advice to overcome common relationship challenges.