the power of courts to declare laws and actions of local, state, or national governments invalid if they violate the Constitution is called
judicial review
. All federal courts have this power, but the supreme court is the first authority on the meaning and the interpretation of the constitution.
What is the name given to the power of the courts to interpret and overturn the actions of the executive and legislative branches?
Judicial review
is the idea, fundamental to the US system of government, that the actions of the executive and legislative branches of government are subject to review and possible invalidation by the judiciary.
What Supreme Court power allows it to affect acts and laws put forth by other branches of government quizlet?
the power of courts to declare laws and actions of local, state, or national governments invalid if they violate the Constitution is called
judicial review
. All federal courts have this power, but the supreme court is the first authority on the meaning and the interpretation of the constitution.
What do you understand by judicial activism?
Judicial activism is
the exercise of the power of judicial review to set aside government acts
. Generally, the phrase is used to identify undesirable exercises of that power, but there is little agreement on which instances are undesirable.
What is judicial self restraint?
In general, judicial restraint is
the concept of a judge not injecting his or her own preferences into legal proceedings and rulings
. Judges are said to exercise judicial restraint if they are hesitant to strike down laws that are not obviously unconstitutional.
How does the Supreme Court decide which cases to hear quizlet?
How does the Supreme Court decide to hear a case? If four judges agree to hear a case,
the court issues a writ of certiorari
. The two sides submit briefs to the Supreme Court and there is a one-hour hearing, thirty minutes per side. The justices then meet in private and vote.
Why do the three branches sometimes come into conflict with one another?
Why do the three branches sometimes come into conflict with one another?
Checks and Balances, political parties and the different kinds of power held by each branch
are sources of conflict. A reasonable basis to believe a person or premises is linked to a crime.
What power does Original Jurisdiction give the courts?
What power does original jurisdiction give the courts? It
gives courts the authority to hold trials and determine the facts of cases
. It gives courts the authority to review the decisions of lower courts and decide whether the law was properly applied.
What are the 3 major powers of the judicial branch?
- Interpreting state laws;
- Settling legal disputes;
- Punishing violators of the law;
- Hearing civil cases;
- Protecting individual rights granted by the state constitution;
- Determing the guilt or innocence of those accused of violating the criminal laws of the state;
Why is the judicial branch the most powerful?
The federal courts’ most important power is that
of judicial review, the authority to interpret the Constitution
. When federal judges rule that laws or government actions violate the spirit of the Constitution, they profoundly shape public policy.
What court case is an example of judicial activism?
Brown v. Board of Education (1954)
is one of the most popular examples of judicial activism to come out of the Warren Court. Warren delivered the majority opinion, which found that segregated schools violated the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment.
How is judicial activism good?
Judicial activism is
highly effective for bringing forth social reforms
. Unlike the legislature, the judiciary is more exposed to the problems in society through the cases it hears. So it can take just decisions to address such problems.
Article 21
and Judicial Activism. Article 21 states: “No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law.”
Why is judicial self-restraint important?
By confining judicial analysis to what the American people adopted in text when they originally made law (i.e., when they adopted the Constitution), judicial self-restraint
ensures that courts cannot invalidate or impose upon the liberty to make laws
. … To succeed, the commitment to judicial self-restraint must be clear.
What are the similarities and differences of judicial restraint and judicial activism?
Judicial activism
interprets the Constitution to be in favor of contemporary values
. Judicial restraint limits the powers of judges to strike down a law, opines that the court should uphold all acts and laws of Congress and legislatures unless they oppose the United States Constitution.
When using judicial restraint a judge will usually?
| Question Answer | When using judicial restraint, a judge will usually…. defer to the decisions of the elected branches of government | Appellate court a court that reviews cases already decided by a lower court/trial court and that may change the lower court’s decision |
|---|
