What Does A Good Explanation Look Like?

by | Last updated on January 24, 2024

, , , ,

A good explanation is a description and justification of a process used to solve a mathematical exercise or problem that includes… …

An appeal to images that relate how the methods

are actually modifying the quantities; • Goal statements that explain the purposes of the methods. • An unbroken chain of causal relations.

What is an example of an explanation?

The definition of an explanation is something that clarifies or makes clear. An example of an explanation is

telling how rain forms

. … The interpretation, meaning, or sense given in explaining.

What should a good explanation have?

A good explanation is

believable

, relevant for the given situation and distinguishes the result from other outcomes. The explanation should also be simple and transparent.

What counts as a good explanation Tok?

What makes up a good explanation? An explanation, in this case, is

a summary or a statement that allows people to understand different concepts

. The discussion will be done in the framework of natural sciences and religion.

What makes an explanation true?

Historically, explanation has been associated with causation: to explain an event or phenomenon is to identify its cause. … A realist interpretation of explanation holds that

the entities or processes an explanation posits actually exist

–the explanation is a literal description of external reality.

What are three qualities of a good explanation?

connections to pupils’ experience; repetition;

humour

. All successful explanations have a clear and logical structure to them, using words, images and analogies that pupils understand and well-chosen examples to illustrate key features.

What is argument and explanation?

An argument is

a rationale in which the reason presents evidence in support of a claim made in the conclusion

. … An explanation is a rationale in which the reason presents a cause of some fact represented by the conclusion. Its purpose is to help us understand how or why that fact occurs.

How do you start an explanation?

  1. For beginning an explanation. at first, initially, to begin with, in the beginning, first of all, the first step.
  2. For continuing an explanation. while, as, at the same time, the next step, after, next, then.
  3. For ending an explanation. finally, eventually, at last, the final/last step.

What is a good sentence for explanation?

“The professor gave a clear explanation of the assignment.” “He gave me a detailed explanation of the process.” “She provided a convenient explanation for not finishing her assignment.” “

There are a number of possible explanations for this.

Is present knowledge dependent on past knowledge?


knowledge being the only source

for present knowledge. … Present knowledge comes not only from past knowledge but also the experimentation of future theories; however, the past provides a basis for our present knowledge.

What is a knowledge claim example?

Here are some examples: “

There are an infinite number of prime numbers

.” This is a first-order knowledge claim because it resides firmly inside the area of knowledge mathematics. … “Mathematical knowledge is certain.” This is a second-order knowledge claim because it is about mathematical knowledge.

What is required in a TOK essay?

Essays should

demonstrate the studentʼs ability to link knowledge issues to areas of knowledge and ways of knowing

. The chosen title must be used exactly as given; it must not be altered in any way. … The essay must be well presented, clearly legible, and, where appropriate, include references and a bibliography.

How do you identify an explanation?

How can you tell the difference between an argument and an explanation? Since the difference is one of purpose,

ask what purpose a piece of reasoning serves

. If it gives evidence that a statement is true, then it’s an argument. If it gives reasons why it’s true, then it’s an explanation.

What are the 3 theories of truth?

The three most widely accepted contemporary theories of truth are [i]

the Correspondence Theory

; [ii] the Semantic Theory of Tarski and Davidson; and [iii] the Deflationary Theory of Frege and Ramsey. The competing theories are [iv] the Coherence Theory , and [v] the Pragmatic Theory .

Does a good explanation need to be true?

With regard to the Natural Sciences and the Arts, good explanations do not have to reflect the truth. However,

good explanations in both subjective and objective contexts must be true

, for the extent to which something is true is based on belief while the extent of truthfulness is founded on reason.

Amira Khan
Author
Amira Khan
Amira Khan is a philosopher and scholar of religion with a Ph.D. in philosophy and theology. Amira's expertise includes the history of philosophy and religion, ethics, and the philosophy of science. She is passionate about helping readers navigate complex philosophical and religious concepts in a clear and accessible way.