What does glaucon say about morality? Glaucon and Adeimantus:
Being moral is beneficial to one; but if one could be immoral without suffering, one would be a fool not to be immoral
(Gyges ring). Even giving the appearance of morality is better than actually acting morally.
What is Glaucon’s view of morality?
Glaucon says that
if you look at what people really are, then you will see that they believe to do wrong is desirable and to suffer wrong is undesirable
. Since we do not want to suffer wrong, we compromise with others and form a compact (a social contract) not to harm each other.
What is the point of morality according to Glaucon in the Ring of Gyges )?
What is the origin of justice and morality according to Glaucon?
What is the significance of Glaucon’s challenge to moral philosophy?
What is the point of Glaucon’s challenge to morality in Plato’s Republic?
After introducing Plato’s Republic, Professor Gendler turns to the discussion of Glaucon’s challenge in Book II. Glaucon challenges Socrates
to defend his claim that acting justly (morally) is valuable in itself, not merely as a means to some other end
(in this case, the reputation one gets from seeming just).
What is Glaucon’s view on human nature?
According to Glaucon, in a state of nature
men inflict and suffer injustice without restraint
. That is simply how human beings are, according to the view he is putting forward. States and common laws exist due to an agreement among those who are relatively weak.
What is the moral of the story of the Ring of Gyges?
The story of Gyges is a great example of moral judgment because it showcases that
people are ready to do anything to satisfy their needs when given true anonymity and left “without control”
. It portrays that people are ready to pursue their own interests even with the intent to harm others.
What is Glaucon’s definition of justice?
Glaucon explains that justice is
a social contract that emerges between people who are roughly equal in power so no one is able to oppress the others since the pain of suffering injustice outweighs the benefit of committing it
.
How does the example of the Ring of Gyges illustrate the question why be moral?
How does the example of the ring of Gyges illustrate the question why be moral? The Ring of Gyges
raises the issue of whether we would do the right thing if we could get away with doing the wrong thing
. It asks whether he have any reason to do what is right when it is not in our own best interest to do so.
Who argues that morality justice is an onerous good?
What story does Glaucon say he has heard about the origin of justice?
What is Glaucon’s challenge?
Glaucon proposes a test to Socrates:
compare the life of a completely just person with the life of a completely unjust person
. Justice is vindicated only if Socrates can show that the just person’s life is better.
What is Glaucon’s distinction between three kinds of good things?
Glaucon states that all goods can be divided into three classes: things that we desire only for their consequences, such as physical training and medical treatment; things that we desire only for their own sake, such as joy; and, the highest class, things we desire both for their own sake and for what we get from them, …
How does Glaucon defend injustice explain the example of the person that finds a ring that makes them invisible?
The ring granted one the power to become invisible at will. Glaucon asserts that
no person would act morally if there was no fear of being caught or punished
. This tale proves that people are only just because they are afraid of punishment for injustice.
What is Glaucon’s proof that men do not desire justice?
Glaucon concludes that
if the just man and unjust man were both given the same ring “one would act no differently from the other, but both would go the same way
. And yet, someone could say that this is great proof that no one is willingly just but only when compelled to be so” (Plato 360 c).
What was the debate between Plato and Glaucon?
Would you still act morally if you have the Ring of Gyges?
What does Plato say about morality?
Why do we need to be moral?
Being moral (or good) is
necessary for having self-respect
. Self-respect is necessary for happiness. … And only people who can make just and fair self-assessments can have self-knowledge. And only just and fair people, good, moral people can make just and fair self-assessment.
Is it better to be just or unjust?
How does the most just person in Glaucon’s Challenge benefit from having a just soul?
It is in a person’s best interests to have a healthy soul, which is a just soul,
so that the person can be truly happy
. This means that by showing justice has an intrinsic value, it can also be concluded that it is better to live a just life opposed to an unjust life.
What is the fundamental question that Glaucon is asking of Socrates in our Plato reading?
How many types of goodness does Glaucon distinguish?
The
three
types of good according to Glaucon are: Good in itself, but not good for consequences (hug: no usefulness to us except make us feel good), good in itself, and good for consequences (health: good for you and allows us to do things), not good in itself, but good for consequences (exercise: no fun to do, but …
What is the moral of the Ring of Gyges story?
The story of Gyges is a great example of moral judgment because it showcases that
people are ready to do anything to satisfy their needs when given true anonymity and left “without control”
. It portrays that people are ready to pursue their own interests even with the intent to harm others.
What view of morality is suggested by the story of the Ring of Gyges?
Terms in this set (12) The teacher of Plato–he argues that the moral life is the good life. Tells the story of the Ring of Gyges and argues that
morality is a second-best compromise
. Made the wearer invisible–source of the ring in the Lord of the Rings.
What was Protagoras philosophy?
What is Socrates response to Glaucon’s challenge?
At this point, Socrates restates Glaucon’s original challenge by saying, “
It was, I believe, said that doing injustice is profitable for the man who is perfectly unjust but has the reputation of being just.
