What Does Hardin Mean By Mutual Coercion?

by | Last updated on January 24, 2024

, , , ,

Mutual Coercion

Mutually Agreed Upon

.

The social arrangements that produce responsibility are arrangements that create coercion

, of some sort. … But temperance also can be created by coercion. Taxing is a good coercive device.

What type of coercion does Hardin endorse?


Mutual Coercion

Mutually Agreed Upon

Hardin recommends instituting “not prohibition, but carefully biased options.” An individual is free to choose between adhering to social agreements and facing sanctions. He uses taxes as an example of mutual coercion.

What does Hardin mean by the term mutual coercion?

Mutual coercion

mutually agreed upon

.

Responsibility is created through coercion and creation of social arraignments

.

Agree on coercion to avoid chaos of

the commons.

What does Hardin mean by a Commons?

In Hardin’s classic piece “

The Tragedy of the Commons

,” a commons is a natural resource shared by many individuals.

1

. In this context, “shared” means that each individual does not have a claim to any part of the resource, but rather, to the use of a portion of it for his/her own benefit.

What did Hardin mean when he said freedom to breed is intolerable?

Freedom To Breed Is Intolerable


If each human family were dependent only on its own resources

; if the children of improvident parents starved to death; if, thus, overbreeding brought its own “punishment” to the germ line – then there would be no public interest in controlling the breeding of families.

What did Hardin mean when he said freedom to breed is intolerable quizlet?

Hardin believes freedom to breed is intolerable. Hardin

says the commons is only justifiable under low population density

. He believes that no technical solution can free us from overpopulation.

What does Hardin characterize as being hard to legislate?

He means that

it’s easy to make the laws

, but it’s harder to make people understand them and follow them without problems.

What is the main point that Garrett Hardin makes in this article?

What is the main point that Garrett Hardin makes in this article?

Our selfish nature is not conducive to the greater good; in order to preserve the greater good, there must be an incentive for the individual

.

What is the main point of the tragedy of Commons?

The tragedy of the commons is a problem in economics that occurs when

individuals neglect the well-being of society in the pursuit of personal gain

. This leads to over-consumption and ultimately depletion of the common resource, to everybody’s detriment.

What is an example of mutual coercion mutually agreed upon?

Mutual Coercion Mutually Agreed Upon.

The social arrangements that produce responsibility are arrangements

that create coercion, of some sort. Consider bank-robbing. The man who takes money from a bank acts as if the bank were a commons.

What does Hardin define as a problem with no technical solution?

What does Hardin mean by a “dilemma” with “no technical solution”? A dilemma with no technical solution means

that you can work towards a solution but there will never be an end all, the solution will never be ideal

.

What is common to many is taken least care of?

The ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle pointed out the problem with common resources: ‘What is common to many is taken least care of, for

all men have greater regard for what is their own than for what they possess in common with others.

How can it be avoided the tragedy of the commons can be avoided by?

How can the tragedy of the commons be avoided by

limiting freedom of access

? It can be avoided through limiting freedom of access because this limitation regulates use and protects it from overuse, allowing it to be used sustainably. You just studied 3 terms!

How did Hardin suggest that the population problem could be solved?

Biologist Garrett Hardin says that the ‘population problem’

cannot be solved by producing more food

. It requires a ‘non-technical’ solution. In other words, technology will not save us from overpopulation. … Hardin used the example of a herd of cattle in a village.

How does Hardin formulate the population problem?

He posed the population problem in stark terms. First, he

examined the relation of population to resources, and concluded population must be brought under control

. He then analyzed the dynamics that have caused population to swell. From this analysis, he proposed solutions.

What did Hardin say about technical solutions to the tragedy of the commons?

The Tragedy of the Commons The

population problem has no technical solution

; it requires a fundamental extension in morality. The population problem has no technical solution; it requires a fundamental extension in morality. … Hardin wanted to address the “population problem”.

Amira Khan
Author
Amira Khan
Amira Khan is a philosopher and scholar of religion with a Ph.D. in philosophy and theology. Amira's expertise includes the history of philosophy and religion, ethics, and the philosophy of science. She is passionate about helping readers navigate complex philosophical and religious concepts in a clear and accessible way.